| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 2320 2016 SLD 2320 2016 MLD 67 2016 PLJ 271 |
Islamabad High Court
Writ Petition No. 2384 of 2015, decided on 18th January, 2016. Date of hearing: 21st october, 2015.
AAMER FAROOQ, JUSTICE
Barrister Umair Majeed Malik and Saad Muhammad Hashmi for Petitioner. Khawaja Saeed-ul-Zafar and Sardar Ahmed Jamal Sukhera for
Respondents. Syed Hussnain Ibrahim Kazmi, Dy. Attorney General for the Federation. Malik Muhammad Nazir, Director Law, Minis
Writ Petition No. 2384 of 2015, decided on 18th January, 2016. Date of hearing: 21st october, 2015.
AAMER FAROOQ, JUSTICE
Barrister Umair Majeed Malik and Saad Muhammad Hashmi for Petitioner. Khawaja Saeed-ul-Zafar and Sardar Ahmed Jamal Sukhera for
Respondents. Syed Hussnain Ibrahim Kazmi, Dy. Attorney General for the Federation. Malik Muhammad Nazir, Director Law, Minis
UCH POWER PRIVATE LIMITED
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND others
Law: Gas Infrastructure Development Cess Act, 2015
Section: 3,4
Gas Infrastructure Development Cess Act (IV of 2015)--------- ----------Ss. 3 & 4---------Vires of Gas Infrastructure Development Cess Act, 2015---------Petitioners assailed Gas Infrastructure Development Cess Act, 2015, to be repugnant to the provisions of Constitution---------Plea raised by petitioners was that the gas was supplied to them from a particular field therefore, no benefit could accrue to them from payment of fee and development of pipelines---------Validity---------Levy of cess was in the nature of fee extending special benefit to a class of people---------Class that would benefit due to cess was that required natural gas for its business or commercial purpose---------Petitioners were producers of electricity and for such process utilized natural gas---------Plea of the petitioners was not tenable as they were users of natural gas and projects for which fee was being charged would eventually benefit them too---------Benefit accruing might not be calculable with mathematical precision or exactitude against the Constitution mode---------Petitioners were commercial/industrial users of natural gas and they would derive benefit from the fee/cess paid by them---------Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. PLD 2014 Isl. 83; 2015 SCMR 1385; East Pakistan Chrome Tannery Pvt. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others 2011 PTD 2643; 1993 SCMR 1705; PLD 1975 SC 50; 1973 SCMR 2; PLD 1981 Lah. 640; Pak. Com Ltd. and others v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2011 SC 44 and The Hinger Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. and others v. The State of Orissa and others AIR 1961 SC 459 ref. Federation of Pakistan v. Durrani Ceramics 2014 SCMR 1630 and PLD 2015 SC 354 rel. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: AAMER FAROOQ, Justice:----------- Through this judgment, the instant petition as well as W.P.No.2383/2015 are being decided as common question of law is involved. Through the instant Constitution petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as W.P. No.2383/2015, the petitioners inter alia seek declaration that Gas Infrastructure Development Cess Act, 2015 is repugnant to the provisions of Constitution and that the Gas…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492