Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 2284 2015 SLD 2284 2015 MLD 1468
Balochistan High Court
R.F.A. No. 16 of 2006, decided on 4th June, 2015. DATE of hearing: 13th April, 2015.
, JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL AND MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATI, JJ
Muhammad Qahir Shah for Appellants. Khushnood Ahmed for
Respondent No. 1. Sher Shah Kasi for
Respondent

RUKHSANA HIDAYATULLAH and 9 others

VS

Syed BAHAUDDIN and another

Law:

Section:

(a) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)--- ----S. 55(1) (a) & (5) (d)---Rights and liabilities of buyer and seller of the property---Scope---Landlord and tenant---Seller of the property was bound to disclose all the encumbrances, charges, dues against a property to the buyer---Buyer had prerogative to purchase the property after having knowledge with or without encumbrances---If buyer had purchased a property with all the liabilities then the encumbrances that were attached to the said property would automatically transfer to the buyer---Tenant, in the present case, had paid 'pagri' to the previous owners---New owner had stepped into the shoes of previous owners after purchase of suit property---New owner was bound by all the deeds and agreements executed between previous owners and tenant after purchase of property---New owner became absolute owner of the property after taking over possession and its charge and payment of entire consideration amount---New owner was entitled for every benefit of the property and at the same time was also responsible for all encumbrances attached to the said property---Ownership of property would pass to the new owner on completion of sale transaction who was bound to pay all the encumbrances attached to the property---Previous owners had no more concern with the property in question nor in any manner were responsible for any of its liability---Tenant was occupying the premises against payment of nominal amount as rent---Liabilities attached to the property was the reason of lesser amount of sale transaction of the same---New owner despite having knowledge of the liabilities attached to the property purchased the same---New owner was beneficiary of eviction of tenant from the shop in question whereas re-payment of amount of 'pagri' was subject to such ejectment---New owner of the property was responsible for payment of the amount of premium received by the previous owners against the shop in question---Had the tenant not been evicted from the premises in question, there would have been no demand of payment of premium---New owner of premises himself opted to get eviction of the tenant---Trial Court had rightly decreed the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492