| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 2284 2015 SLD 2284 2015 MLD 1468 |
Balochistan High Court
R.F.A. No. 16 of 2006, decided on 4th June, 2015. DATE of hearing: 13th April, 2015.
, JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL AND MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATI, JJ
Muhammad Qahir Shah for Appellants. Khushnood Ahmed for
Respondent No. 1. Sher Shah Kasi for
Respondent
R.F.A. No. 16 of 2006, decided on 4th June, 2015. DATE of hearing: 13th April, 2015.
, JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL AND MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATI, JJ
Muhammad Qahir Shah for Appellants. Khushnood Ahmed for
Respondent No. 1. Sher Shah Kasi for
Respondent
RUKHSANA HIDAYATULLAH and 9 others
VS
Syed BAHAUDDIN and another
Law:
Section:
(a) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)--- ----S. 55(1) (a) & (5) (d)---Rights and liabilities of buyer and seller of the property---Scope---Landlord and tenant---Seller of the property was bound to disclose all the encumbrances, charges, dues against a property to the buyer---Buyer had prerogative to purchase the property after having knowledge with or without encumbrances---If buyer had purchased a property with all the liabilities then the encumbrances that were attached to the said property would automatically transfer to the buyer---Tenant, in the present case, had paid 'pagri' to the previous owners---New owner had stepped into the shoes of previous owners after purchase of suit property---New owner was bound by all the deeds and agreements executed between previous owners and tenant after purchase of property---New owner became absolute owner of the property after taking over possession and its charge and payment of entire consideration amount---New owner was entitled for every benefit of the property and at the same time was also responsible for all encumbrances attached to the said property---Ownership of property would pass to the new owner on completion of sale transaction who was bound to pay all the encumbrances attached to the property---Previous owners had no more concern with the property in question nor in any manner were responsible for any of its liability---Tenant was occupying the premises against payment of nominal amount as rent---Liabilities attached to the property was the reason of lesser amount of sale transaction of the same---New owner despite having knowledge of the liabilities attached to the property purchased the same---New owner was beneficiary of eviction of tenant from the shop in question whereas re-payment of amount of 'pagri' was subject to such ejectment---New owner of the property was responsible for payment of the amount of premium received by the previous owners against the shop in question---Had the tenant not been evicted from the premises in question, there would have been no demand of payment of premium---New owner of premises himself opted to get eviction of the tenant---Trial Court had rightly decreed the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492