| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 104 2015 SLD 104 2015 PLD 78 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 1277 of 2014, heard on 7th July, 2014
ARSHAD MAHMOOD TABASSUM, J
Sh. Ahsan ud Din for Petitioner, Sh. Muhammad Yaqub for
Respondents. Shahid Mahmood Abbasi, A.A.G. with Majeed, S.I. for the State.
Writ Petition No. 1277 of 2014, heard on 7th July, 2014
ARSHAD MAHMOOD TABASSUM, J
Sh. Ahsan ud Din for Petitioner, Sh. Muhammad Yaqub for
Respondents. Shahid Mahmood Abbasi, A.A.G. with Majeed, S.I. for the State.
MUHAMMAD IRFAN
VS
THE STATE and 3 others
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 489-F
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 10-A,199
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 59,84
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ---S. 489-F---Qanun-e-Shahadat (X of 1984), Arts.59 & 84--- Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.10-A & 199---Constitutional petition--- Dishonestly issuing a cheque---Expert opinion-Comparison of signatures-Right of fair trial---Petitioner was facing trial on allegation of dishonestly issuing bank cheque which was dis-honoured on presentation-Petitioner denied issuing of any cheque and his application for getting comparison of his signatures on cheque from Hand Writing Expert :vas dismissed by Trial Court as well as lower Appellate Court---Validity---Power of Trial Court to itself compare cheque in dispute with admitted signatures of complainant (petitioner), as envisaged under Art.84 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, did not debar Trial Court form sending the cheque for comparison to Finger Print Expert---Expert evidence was admissible in evidence under Art.59 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, and if such evidence was not available, only then Trial Court could itself compare the cheque with admitted signatures of petitioner-Petitioner was entitled to fair trial, in view of Art.10-A of the Constitution-Denial on the part of Trial Court to send cheque it: dispute to Finger Print Expert, was violative of the provisions of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984---Trial Court as well as lower Appellate Court failed to exercise their jurisdiction vested in them under law and had illegally dismissed application submitted by petitioner-Petition was allowed in circumstances. Sohbat Ali v. Muhammad Alam PLD 2012 SC (AJ&K) 1 and Muhammad Kabeer ud Din v. Muhammad Munir ud Din 1993 CLC 747 rel. JUDGMENT ARSHAD MAHMOOD TABASSUM, J.---A criminal case vide F.I.R. No.449, dated 11-12-2013, offence under section 489-F, P.P.C., was registered against the petitioner at Police Station Wah Cantt. During trial through an application dated 28-3-2014, the petitioner prayed for sending his admitted signatures and cheque in dispute to the Forensic Science Agency, Lahore for comparison of his signatures, on the ground that he had not issued the cheque in dispute rather the complainant had stolen his cheque book and had forged his signatures on the cheque in dispute. The said…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492