Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 2295 2016 SLD 2295 2016 YLR 1202
Peshawar High Court

QAISER RASHID KHAN, JUSTICE
S. Mastan Ali Zaidi for Appellants. Mohsin Ali for
Respondent.

SUBA and 2 others

VS

. Malik FALAKSHER

Law:

Section:

(a) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-emption Act (X of 1987)--- ----S. 13---Talbs, performance of---Conditions---Majlis for performance of Talb-i-Muwathibat---Scope---Pre-emptor had not mentioned the presence of any other person except the informer at the time of information---Talb-i-Muwathibat must be performed in a Majlis after receiving information with regard to sale transaction---Sans Majlis there would be no concept of performance of Talb-i-Muwathibat---Neither constitution of Majlis at the time of performance of Talb-i-Muwathibat nor alleged jumping demand had been proved by the pre-emptor on the relevant date, time and place---Pre-emptor had failed to prove notice of Talb-i-Ishhad in accordance with law---Both Talb-i-Muwathibat and Talb-i-Ishhad which were sine qua non for the success of a pre-emption suit stood disproved---Suit of plaintiff was bound to fail---Both the courts had committed illegality and material irregularity while decreeing the suit---Impugned s and decrees passed by both the courts below were set aside---Suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed---Revision was accepted in circumstances. (b) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-emption Act (X of 1987)--- ----S. 13---Talb-i-Muwathibat, performance of---Conditions---Talb-i-Muwathibat must be performed in a Majlis after receiving information with regard to sale transaction. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: QAISER RASHID KHAN, JUSTICE:----------- Through the instant revision petition, the petitioners have called in question the judgment and decree dated 16.5.2006 of the learned Civil Judge-III, D.I.Khan whereby pre-emption suit of the respondent/plaintiff was decreed against the petitioners/ defendants as well as the judgment and decree dated 12.7.2007 of the learned Additional District Judge-II, D.I. Khan, vide which the appeal of the petitioners/ defendants was partially allowed. 2. Relevant facts giving rise to the instant revision petition, in brief, are that respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for possession through pre-emption of land measuring three kanals situated in village Mandhra, Tehsil and District D.I.Khan against the petitioners/ defendants on the basis of superior right of pre-emption averring in the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492