| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1973 SLG 53 1973 SLD 53 1973 SCMR 116 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. K-3 of 1966, decision dated: 23rd January 1969.(On appeal from the judgment and Order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi Bench, Karachi, dated the 22nd January 1965, in Writ Petition No. 12 of 1965)
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, SAJJAD AHMAD, ABDUS SATTAR AND QADEERUDDIN AHMAD, JJ
N. A. Faruqui, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by K. A. Ghani, Attorney for Appellant. Sayeed A. Shaikh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Shafiq Ahmad Senior Attorney for
Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. K-3 of 1966, decision dated: 23rd January 1969.(On appeal from the judgment and Order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi Bench, Karachi, dated the 22nd January 1965, in Writ Petition No. 12 of 1965)
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, SAJJAD AHMAD, ABDUS SATTAR AND QADEERUDDIN AHMAD, JJ
N. A. Faruqui, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by K. A. Ghani, Attorney for Appellant. Sayeed A. Shaikh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Shafiq Ahmad Senior Attorney for
Respondents.
YAQOOB
VS
ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Satisfaction of Charges (Evacuee Property) Rules, 1961, r. 4(b)(ii)-Expression "for purchase of property"-Lease-hold interest of an evacuee -"Real property" in every sense of the termHindu, after having received consideration in cash, entering into partnership agreement with a displaced person for transfer of his lease-hold (in cinema) and thereafter migrating to India-Payments made by displaced person, held, fall within exception of r. 4(b)(ii). (b) Partnership-Assets-Every partner is, in absence of special agreement to contrary, equally interested in whole of partnership assets--ease-hold interest of one partner becoming asset of firm Other partner acquires interest therein. While it is true that a partner cannot claim any asset of a partnership as exclusively his own until a distribution of the assets thereof has taken place, yet in law every partner is, in the absence of any special agreement to the contrary, equally interested in the whole of the partnership assets, and if the property happened to be real property then the legal estate in it would be governed by the ordinary doctrines of real property. It is futile, therefore, to argue that even if the lease-hold interest became an asset of the firm, the other partner acquired no interest therein. A leasehold interest is, subject to any contract to the contrary, both transferable and heritable under the Transfer of Property Act. Ajudhia Pershad Ram v. Sham Sunder and others A I R 1947 Lah. 13 and Lindley's Partnership, 11th Edn., p. 436 ref: JUDGMENT HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C. J.-This appeal, by special leave, arises out of an order of a Division Bench of the High Court of West Pakistan at Karachi summarily dismissing a petition under Article 98 of the Constitution filed by the appellant herein. The appellant, who was a displaced person from Bombay in India, had entered into an agreement on 9-5-49 with one, Hariram Rewachand, a Hindu resident of Karachi, for running a cinema business in co-partnership. The latter, it appears, had earlier on 3-5-47 acquired a lease-hold interest for 20 years certain in respect of the premises wherein the cinema house, known as Imperial Talkies, was situated, being Plot No.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492