| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 3718 2016 SLD 3718 2016 YLR 1205 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeals Nos. 947 of 2010 and 135-J of 2012, heard on 27th October, 2015. Date of hearing: 27th October, 2015.
AALIA NEELUM AND SARDAR MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ DOGAR, JUSTICE
Mian Abdul Waheed for Appellants (in Crl. A. No.947 of 2010). Shahid Ali Shakir for Appellants (in Crl. A. No.135-J of 2012). Muhammad Akhlaq, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State.
Criminal Appeals Nos. 947 of 2010 and 135-J of 2012, heard on 27th October, 2015. Date of hearing: 27th October, 2015.
AALIA NEELUM AND SARDAR MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ DOGAR, JUSTICE
Mian Abdul Waheed for Appellants (in Crl. A. No.947 of 2010). Shahid Ali Shakir for Appellants (in Crl. A. No.135-J of 2012). Muhammad Akhlaq, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State.
SAEEDA GULL and others
VS
. The STATE--Respondents
Law:
Section:
Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997)----- -----S. 9(c)-----Possession, import or export, trafficking or financing trafficking of narcotic drugs-----Appreciation of evidence-----Prosecution failed to prove recovery of narcotic substances and safe custody of the same-----False implication, plea of-----Twenty kilograms of Charas along with cash were alleged to have been recovered from accused, while they were transporting the same-----Trial Court, having convicted accused under S. 9(c) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment, along with payment of fine-----Prosecution had neither established safe custody of recovered substance, nor had it produced all recovery witnesses-----Statements of police witnesses as to handing over of accused and case property were contradictory-----Prosecution was under duty to establish by cogent evidence that the Charas, seized from possession of accused, had been kept in safe custody-----Place, where samples of the recovered substance had been kept during time from its seizure till its deposit in Malkhana on the same day, was not clear-----Recovered narcotic substance was shown to have been handed over to police constable for its transmission to Chemical Examiner Office after many days of the recovery; whereas, the samples were deposited in Chemical Examiner Office on the next day-----Mere oral evidence as to recovery of Charas could not discharge the heavy burden, which lay on prosecution-----Prosecution, in view of said inconsistencies and contradictions, was not able to prove safe custody of the recovered substance through material and cogent evidence-----Police witness deposed that he had separated ten grams from each packet for chemical analysis, but during cross-examination, he had admitted that they had weights in their investigation box from twenty grams to two kilograms-----Said contradictions in deposition of police officials could be stated to be minor and irrelevant in absence of positive and material evidence-----Prosecution had failed to prove the charges against the accused-----High Court, setting aside conviction, acquitted all accused-----Appeals against…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492