| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 2885 2015 SLD 2885 2015 PCRLJ 1540 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeals Nos. 1386, 1631, 1610, Criminal Revision No. 729 and Murder Reference No. 370 of 2010, heard on 10th December, 2014.
SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI AND SYED SHAHBAZ ALI RIZVI, JJ
Sardar Khurram Latif Khan Khosa for Appellant (in Crl. Appeal No. 1386 of 2010). Naseem Ullah Khan Niazi for Appellant (in Crl. Appeal No. 1631 of 2010). Nazar Abbas Syed for the Complainant. Mian Muhammad Awais Mazhar, Dy. Prosecutor General for the S
Criminal Appeals Nos. 1386, 1631, 1610, Criminal Revision No. 729 and Murder Reference No. 370 of 2010, heard on 10th December, 2014.
SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI AND SYED SHAHBAZ ALI RIZVI, JJ
Sardar Khurram Latif Khan Khosa for Appellant (in Crl. Appeal No. 1386 of 2010). Naseem Ullah Khan Niazi for Appellant (in Crl. Appeal No. 1631 of 2010). Nazar Abbas Syed for the Complainant. Mian Muhammad Awais Mazhar, Dy. Prosecutor General for the S
FATEH SHER and others
VS
The STATE and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 201, 364 & 34---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.129(g)---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.164---Qatl-i-amd, causing disappearance of evidence of offence or giving false information to screen offender, kidnapping, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Withholding of material evidence---Extra-judicial confession---Ocular account furnished by prosecution witnesses could not be believed, as both the witnesses kept silent for 6/7 days and did not disclose the occurrence to anybody---Delay in disclosing the occurrence to the Police, and the mysterious silence of the witnesses, had gone unexplained during the trial---Statement of one of the prosecution witnesses, was also pregnant with dishonest and material improvements, which had further created doubt about the probity of his evidence---Prosecution had given up the only material witness, being unnecessary---Inference against the prosecution, in circumstances, was to be drawn for such withholding of material witness, under Art.129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984---Unnatural conduct of prosecution witness, cast serious doubt on veracity of his testimony---Accused persons, remained on extensive physical remand, but motorcycle on which the deceased was allegedly abducted, could not be recovered---No other independent witness to corroborate the stance of the complainant qua the abduction of deceased by accused and co-accused had been produced, despite alleged presence of other witnesses at the relevant time---Flagrant and material improvements, in the statements of the prosecution witnesses, had rendered the same doubtful, which could be kept out of consideration by the court---Co-accused had been acquitted of the charge by the Trial Court disbelieving prosecution's evidence and his extra-judicial confession---Conviction of accused could not be maintained on the basis of disbelieved extra-judicial confession---Evidence of extra-judicial confession, even, otherwise, was not confidence inspiring and believable---Evidence of recovery, which was corroboratory in nature in isolation, was not sufficient to connect the accused with the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492