Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 2360 2016 SLD 2360 2016 PLD 730
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 79-K of 2015, decided on 2nd June, 2016.Date of hearing: 29th December, 2015.
ANWAR ZAHEER, JAMALI, C.J. AND MAQBOOL BAQAR AND FAISAL ARAB, JUSTICEJ
Moin Azhar Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Mushtaq A. Memon, Advocate Supreme Court and K.A. Wahab, Advocate-onRecord for
Respondent No.1. Date of hearing: 29th December, 2015.

COMBIND INVESTMENT (PVT.) LTD:VSWALI BHAI AND others

Law: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979

Section: 2(h), 3 & 15(2) (iii) (b)

[Majority view] (a) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--------- ----------Ss. 2(h), 3 & 15(2) (iii) (b)---------Hotel premises---------Applicability of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979---------Rent Controller, Justiceurisdiction of---------Premises let out to tenant for commercial/residential purposes---------Tenant using the premises for running a hotel---------Whether tenant wrong/unauthorized user of premises---------Whether jurisdiction of Rent Controller ousted---------Rented premises, in the present case, which was being unilaterally used by the tenant as a hotel, did not fall within the meaning of "hotel" as used in S.2(h) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979---------Written lease agreements executed between the parties proved that at no point in time the demised premises was ever let out to the tenant as a "hotel"---------Rented premises was let out for the purpose of business/residential use, however the subsequent change in its use for running a hotel by the tenant, that too unilaterally, would not take away the jurisdiction of the Rent Controller---------Provisions of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 were thus duly applicable to the present case---------Tenant had himself submitted to the jurisdiction of the Rent Controller by filing an application for deposit of rent before the Rent Controller---------Tenant was, thus, estopped from his conduct to challenge the jurisdiction of the Rent Controller---------[Per Faisal Arab, Justice: Tenant by pleading that rental premises on account of its use as a hotel was excluded from the provisions of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 , was denying himself the protection of rent laws, and was relegating his status from a tenant to a mere licensee---------Tenant had acquired interest in the premises on monthly rental basis in his capacity as tenant, thus his status could not be converted to that of a licensee---------Only legal remedy to seek eviction of tenant was to file an eviction application under the provisions of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979]---------[Per Maqbool Baqar, Justice. (Minority view): Premises was leased out to the tenant for "business/residential'…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register