| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 2382 2016 SLD 2382 2016 PLD 506 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. 30 of 2014, decided on 15thMarch, 2016. Date of hearing: 25th January, 2016.
AHMED ALI M. SHAIKH AND MUHAMMAD KARIM KHAN AGHA, JUSTICEJ
Ghulam Haider Shaikh for Appellant.Asif Ali Pirzada for
Respondents.
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. 30 of 2014, decided on 15thMarch, 2016. Date of hearing: 25th January, 2016.
AHMED ALI M. SHAIKH AND MUHAMMAD KARIM KHAN AGHA, JUSTICEJ
Ghulam Haider Shaikh for Appellant.Asif Ali Pirzada for
Respondents.
THE STATE THROUGH DIRECTOR, INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS AND EXCISE)VSHAJI NABI BUX AND another
Law:
Section:
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)-- ----------Ss. 9(c), 48 & 72---------Customs Act (IV of 1969), S.185-F---------Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.417 (2A)---------Notification SRO 486(1)/2007, dated 9-6-2007---------Appeal against acquittal---------Maintain-ability---------Locus standi---------Director of Intelligence---------Accused persons were alleged to have transported poppy seeds for which Customs officials filed case under the provisions of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997--------- Both the accused were acquitted by Trial Court and Director Intelligence of Customs filed appeal against acquittal---------Validity---------It might be that appellant being Director Intelligence and Investigation Federal Board of Revenue, in his view was a person aggrieved by the order of acquittal so as to fall within the purview of S.417 (2A), Cr.P.C:---------It was the Federal Board of Revenue that lodged FIR, filed Challan and prosecuted the case and as such was the most concerned with the outcome of the case---------When acquittal came in the Director Intelligence had every right to feel aggrieved and dissatisfied with acquittal order which related to a customs case although triable under Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997---------Appellant could only file appeal in his capacity as Director under S.185-F of Customs Act, 1969, read with notification SRO 486(I)/2007, dated 9-6-2007, but was not entitled to file an appeal through or on behalf of the State which could only have been done by a duly authorized and instructed law officer---------Director Intelligence and Investigation had no lawful authority to file appeal through the State against acquittal of accused persons---------Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. Haji Muhammad Aslam v. Director General Pakistan Coast Guards 2012 PTD 629; F.A. Corporation v. Director General Customs Intelligence and Investigation 2008 PTD 1365; Haji Abdullah Jan v. The State 2003 SCMR 1063; The State v. Munawar ud Din 1985 PCr.LJ 1431; The State v. Bashir Ahmad 2003 YLR 2229 and Director Directorate General of Intelligence and Investigation v. Messrs Al Faiz Industries (Pvt.) Limited 2006 SCMR 129…