Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 942 2015 SLD 942 2015 PLC 1528
Sindh High Court
C.P. No. D-3272 of 2010, decided on 10th August, 2015. Date of hearing: 10th August, 2015.
MUNIB AKHTAR AND SYED SAEEDUDDIN NASIR, JJ
Javed Asghar Awan and Ashfaq Rafiq Janjua Standing Counsel for
Respondents.

BADAR MUNIR

VS

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Ministry of Finance and 2 others

Law:

Section:

Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199--- Constitutional petition--- Laches--- Bank employee---Optional retirement scheme---Discretion of Bank---Cause of action---Employee applied for optional retirement scheme announced by the Bank but his request was declined---Employee opted for retirement voluntarily from the service of Bank---Contention of employee was that he had been deprived of seeking benefits with regard to encashment of entire accumulated leave with full salary and allowances---Validity---Optional retirement scheme offered by the Bank to its staff members who had completed twenty years of continuous service was not available to all the staff members---Out of eighty six applications for the said retirement scheme only fifty applications were accepted whereas thirty six applications including the application of petitioner were declined---Applications under the said scheme were to be considered by the Bank on individual basis---Bank had discretion to either accept or reject any application for optional retirement without assigning any reason---Bank was not bound to accept all the applications which were made to it by its staff members under the said scheme---Employee voluntarily requested for his retirement after completion of twenty five years of continuous service which was accepted by the Bank---Petitioner was finally relieved from duty after completion of all formalities and all the retirement benefits were released to the employee---Employee was aware of the fact that his request for optional retirement under the optional retirement scheme had been turned down by the Bank---Employee, after having acquiesced to be retired from service could not turn around and press his demand for retirement under the optional retirement scheme---Present constitutional petition was filed after a delay of twelve years which suffered from laches---No cause of action had accrued to the employee for filing of present constitutional petition which was liable to be dismissed---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. JUDGMENT SYED SAEEDUDDIN NASIR, J.--- Only grievance of the petitioner is that during his service and upon introduction of "OPTIONAL…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492