| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 1635 2016 SLD 1635 2016 PLJ 569 |
Crl. A. No. 347 of 2014, heard on 23.2.2016. Date of hearing: 23.2.2016.
HAFIZ SHAHID NADEEM KAHLOON, J.
Mr. Javed Abbas Sial, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Hassan Mehmood Khan Tareen, D.P.G. for State. Mr. Waseem Sarwar Khan and Bashir Ahmad Khan, Advocates with Complainant.
RIAZ HUSSAIN---Appellant
VS
STATE and another--Respondents
Law:
Section:
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----Ss. 365-B & 337-L(ii)--Sworn affidavits--No objection over acquittal of accused in order to condense litigation--Validity--No appeal against acquittal of appellant under Section 365-B & 337/L(ii), PPC and criminal revision for enhancement of sentence of appellant had been filed--Reason given by trial Court for acquittal of appellant under Section 365-B, PPC regarding story of abduction of victim is disbelieved qua evidence of complainant, therefore, there is no need to reappraise deposition to extent of abduction of victim (PW-2). Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 376--Sentence--Abducted and committed rape--Dishonest improvement--Conflicted with medical evidence and report of DNA test--Sole witness--Ocular account--According to her deposition, she was virgin unmarried at time of incident and she was abducted--Accused committed rape with her--Hymen of alleged victim was not in-tact, old healed tags were present on periphery--Vaginal orifice was visible--Two fingers could easily be passed--Doctor stated in her examination-in-chief that report of forensic science agency for DNA test was received, according to which no seminal material was identified--No analysis was conducted at that time--In cross-examination, lady doctor admitted that examinee was found to be old sexual case and was used to sexual act before examination--DNA report had not identified semen with respect to appellant--Prosecution had miserably failed to establish charge against appellant beyond any shadow of doubt--It was duty of prosecution to prove its case while standing on its own legs from hilt to guilt but prosecution had not fulfilled its obligation--It is settled law that where any doubt or suspicion appears to be existed then benefit thereof always is extended in favour of accused being favourite child of law--Contradictions in ocular account as well as medical evidence coupled with affidavits sworn by complainant and victim by contending that they had got no objection for acquittal of appellant--Appeal was accepted. JUDGMENT This Criminal Appeal filed by Riaz Hussain the appellant, is directed against judgment dated…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492