Case Details

Citation(s)
2014 SLG 1198 2014 SLD 1198 2014 PCRLJ 99
High Court (AJ&K)
Appeal/Revision Petition No.3 of 2012, decision dated: 4-6-2013
MUNIR AHMED CHAUDHARY, J

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

ABDUL JABBAR/

VS

The STATE through Assistant AdvocatEGeneral Kotli and 2 others

Law:

Section:

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)----S. 561-A--- Treating appeal or revision as application under S.561-A, Cr.P.C.---Scope---Appeal or revision, could be treated as an application under S.561-A, Cr.P.C. PLD 1987 Quetta 94; PLD 1990 SC 83; 1995 PCr.LJ 1838; 2000 SCMR 1904 and 2007 PCr.LJ 613 ref. PLD 1987 Quetta 94 rel. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 439-A--- Appeal or revision, would not lie against the order of Sessions Judge/Additional Sessions Judge passed in revision. (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 195(1) & 561-A---Lodging a criminal complaint in a civil matter regarding manipulation of documents (subject-matter of proceedings)---Scope---Litigant in a civil matter, was prevented under S.195(1), Cr.P.C. for lodging a criminal complaint regarding the alleged manipulation of documents, which were subject-matter of said proceedings---Such a complaint, could only be lodged by concerned court after it would come to the conclusion that the document in question was forged. 2007 PCr.LJ 613 rel. (d) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 173---Report of Police Officer based on oath made by prosecution witness---Investigating Agency, in the present case, had relied only on an oath made by a prosecution witness and submitted its report under S.173, Cr.P.C.---Validity---Oath proceedings and procedure of swearing upon Holy Quran, was not applicable in criminal cases. PLD 1990 SC 83 and 1995 PCr.LJ 1838 rel. ORDER MUNIR AHMED CHAUDHARY, J.---This "appeal/revision petition" has been filed against the order of Additional Sessions Judge Kotli dated 10-2-2012, through which a revision petition filed by the present petitioner/accused was dismissed and order of Magistrate Section 30, Cr.P.C. Kotli dated 27-7-2011 was upheld. 2. Brief facts giving rise to the present matter and that during pendency of a civil suit, the present petitioner submitted an attorney on behalf of one Maqbool Hussain before the court. The said court ordered to initiate proceedings against the present petitioner for preparing fictitious and fraudulent document. The criminal case was registered against the present petitioner Abdul Jabbar on…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492