Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 3632 2016 SLD 3632 2016 MLD 1558
Sindh High Court, Sukkur Bench

SHAHNAWAZ TARIQ, JUSTICE
Syed Sardar Ali Shah A.P.G. for the State.

MANZOOR HUSSAIN SHAHWANI--Applicant

VS

S.H.O. P.S. €œA€ SECTION KHAIRPUR AND 5 OTHERS --RespondentS

Law:

Section:

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- --------S. 324---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.561-A---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd---Application for quashing of order---Application for---Summary report submitted by Investigating Officer under 'B' class, having been accepted by Judicial Magistrate in "c" class, applicant had sought quashing of said order of Judicial Magistrate---Applicant and accused were real brothers, and dispute was between them over landed property---Alleged incident occurred at 3.30 p.m. near the outer gate of Sessions Court building; and at relevant time presence of general public, litigants and other advocates, could not be ruled out --------- Prosecution witness was real brother of accused and respondent but he was in league with the applicant; and was an interested witness; his statement could not be believed in the absence of corroboration of any independent evidence --------- Prudent mind would not accept that except prosecution witness, none else witnessed the incident, though the place of incident was situated on a main busy road; and surrounded by courts; shops, hotels, offices of advocates; and was residential as well as commercial area---Allegations of applicant were not supported by any independent witness of the vicinity---Applicant, did not approach the concerned Police Station insistently for the lodgment of FIR; and he remained busy in court proceedings of his different cases for two days---Such demeanour of applicant had not only created serious doubt regarding the commission of alleged incident, but invalidated the factum of occurrence---No empty was secured by the Investigating Officer from the spot, which was also fatal to the allegations levelled by applicant---Magistrate was obliged to examine the averments of FIR, statements under S.161, Cr.P.C., recorded during investigation, and final summary report submitted by Investigating Officer judiciously; and after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to complainant; should pass an appropriate order supported with sound reasons by exercising power envisaged under S.173, Cr.P.C., and procedure provided in R.47.7, Vol.III, Police Rules, 1934---Magistrate had afforded right of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492