Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 2945 2015 SLD 2945 2015 PCRLJ 1524
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 136 of 2013-ATA and Capital Sentence Referene No. 5 of 2013, decided on 21st November, 2014.
QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED AND MUHAMMAD TARIQ ABBASI, JJ
Sardar Mehboob for Appellants. Malik Riaz Ahmad Saghla, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State

TAHIR MEHMOOD alias ACCHU and another

VS

The STATE and another

Law:

Section:

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 324, 186 & 353---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S.7---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty, act of terrorism---Appreciation of evidence---Three prosecution witnesses/Police Officials, were in complete union with fourth one---Reports of Chemical Examiner and Serologist, were in positive---Pistol recovered from accused, was in operating condition, and accompanying empties wedded therewith---Manner in which the deceased was killed, was not shrouded in mystery---Deceased, being Police Official, had laid his life in line of duty valiantly, while vindicating the dignity and honour of his calling---FIR, was not result of consultation, or deliberation, as accused was arrested red-handed with his weapon; no occasion or necessity existed for such an exercise---No material contradictions were found in the statements of witnesses, who were subjected to a grueling cross-examination---Difference between timings, given by some of the witnesses, was of no consequence, as such minute things were not observed in situation of crisis---No irreconcilable contradiction was found among the eye-witnesses---Police Officials, were as good witnesses as anyone from the public, for the reason that, it was not the status of a person that conferred credibility on him as a witness, but it was intrinsic value of his testimony, which was considered for acceptance of his deposition---Police Officials, in the present case, were natural witnesses, their presence at the spot could not be disputed---Even-dated dispatch of casings and 30 caliber pistol, lent corroborative support to prosecution's case without reservation---Where an accused was arrested red-handed, with the weapon and casings were secured the same day, even-dated dispatch, would not diminish value of a positive report---Objection about omission by the Trial Court to specifically mention S.7 of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, in the charge, was merely hyper-technical, causing no prejudice to accused, who was fully conscious about the nature of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492