| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 1502 2013 SLD 1502 2013 SCMR 170 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.765 of 2012, Suo Motu Case No.16 of 2011 and Criminal Original Petition No.96 of 2012, decision dated: 14-12-2012
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA AND ANWAR ZAHEER, JAMALI, JJ
Muhammad Zahoor Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in Criminal Original Petition No. 96 of 2012). Qasim Mirjatt, Additional A.G. Sindh and Zafar Ahmad Khan, Additional P.G. Sindh on Court Notice. Nemo for
Respondents.
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.765 of 2012, Suo Motu Case No.16 of 2011 and Criminal Original Petition No.96 of 2012, decision dated: 14-12-2012
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA AND ANWAR ZAHEER, JAMALI, JJ
Muhammad Zahoor Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in Criminal Original Petition No. 96 of 2012). Qasim Mirjatt, Additional A.G. Sindh and Zafar Ahmad Khan, Additional P.G. Sindh on Court Notice. Nemo for
Respondents.
SUO MOTU CASE NO. 16 OF 2011 (Law and Order Situation in Karachi) CRIMINAL ORIGINAL NO.96 OF 2012 Senator HAJI ADEEL
VS
Raja MUHAMMAD ABBAS and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Constitution of Pakistan----Arts. 204(2) & 184(3)---Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003), S.3---Contempt of court---Notice for contempt of the Supreme Court, issuance of---Use of derogatory, contemptuous and threatening language against the Judges of the Supreme Court in a public speech---Alleged contemnor, who was leader of a political party, delivered a speech addressing the general public, wherein allegedly he used derogatory language against the Judges of the Supreme Court---Supreme Court observed that perusal of script of said speech suggested that derogatory remarks made by alleged contemnor were critical and also contemptuous in nature; that prima facie, contents of speech in question tantamount to interference with and obstruction of the process of the Court by advancing threats to the Judges of the Supreme Court and it also tended to bring the Judges into hatred, ridicule and contempt; that process of the Supreme Court was also likely to be prejudiced, relating to implementation of the issues arising out of the directions given by the Supreme Court in the case of Watan Party v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2011 SC 997)---Supreme Court directed for issuance of notice under Art.204 of the Constitution read with S.3 of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 to the alleged contemnor, who was directed to appear in person and explain as to why he should not be proceeded against for contempt of court in accordance with the Constitution and the law. Watan Party v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2011 SC 997 ref. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 204(2) & 184(3)---Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003), S.3---Contempt of court---Notice for contempt of Supreme Court, issuance of---Non-implementation of directions of the Supreme Court given in the of Watan Party v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2011 SC 997)---Petitioner contended that despite directions of the Supreme Court in the said lives and properties of people in Karachi city had not been protected and there was no respite in loss of human life; that the city administration had failed to improve the situation and thus the directions of the Supreme Court had been wilfully ignored rather…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492