Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 1388 2016 SLD 1388
Peshawar High Court
W.P No: 1006-A of 2015, 18.02.2016
QALANDAR ALI KHAN, J

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Usman Ali Khan .Etc

VS

Kpk - Bar .Etc

Law:

Section:

QALANDAR ALI KHAN ,J:- This writ petition has been filed by Usman Ali Khan and 15 other petitioners, all practicing/getting training in District Bar Abbottabad, for the following declaration; "I The petitioners/entire batch of session 2013 who has successfully completed their courses, have qualified their LLB examination and have undergone comprehensive training with their seniors under rule 35 of the KPK Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Rules, 2010, are entitled to be enrolled as advocates of subordinate Courts from the date their actual commencement of training which has been furnished by their seniors on from "B" according to the verdict of W.P No.2525/2014 decided on 25.09.2014 by this Honourable Court. II. That necessary directions may please be passed to the respondent Bar Council to amend the record in case of seniority/enrolment of the petitioners/entire batch of petitioners accordingly. III. That the seniority of the petitioners/batch of the petitioners be pleased directed to be reckoned from the date of their actual commencement of training as furnished by them through their seniors on from B." 2. It has been averred in the writ petition that the petitioners were law-graduates from the University of Peshawar, 2013 (exams concludes in the first week of May 2014 and result declared in August 2014.) and started working in Courts after completion of their courses (some got their license to practice while other were still waiting for their interview to be admitted as advocates under Chapter V of the KPK Legal Practitioner and Bar Council Rules 2010). The petitioners pointed out that Pakistan Bar Council changed criteria for admission as advocates during Session 2013 and introduced the requirement of passing NTS examination after announcement of final results of LLB so as to become entitled for six months internship period, thus a total of more than one year was required. (If otherwise the enrolments exams were conducted timely) to be admitted as an advocate to the subordinate Courts. They claimed that they tried to send their first intimation forms along with their other batch fellows of Session 2013 to the respondent/authority after starting of their…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492