| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 1665 2015 SLD 1665 (2015) 372 ITR 651 |
Allahabad High Court
IT Appeal No. 162 of 2013, JULY 26, 2013
SUNIL AMBWANI AND SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, JJ
Dhananjay Awasthi for the Appellant
IT Appeal No. 162 of 2013, JULY 26, 2013
SUNIL AMBWANI AND SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, JJ
Dhananjay Awasthi for the Appellant
Commissioner of IncomE tax
v.
Intezar Ali
Law:
Section:
ORDER 1. We have heard Shri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the income tax department. The affidavit of service of the assessee has been filed but no one appears for the respondent assessee. 2. This income tax appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arises out of order dated 8.3.2013 passed by the Income Tax appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'C' New Delhi in ITA No.1657/Del/2012 for the assessment year 2008-09. The department has preferred this appeal on the substantial questions of law framed in the memo of appeal as follows:- "(1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition by holding that it is prevalent practice in the land transaction not to show full consideration and ignoring all the concrete findings of the lower authorities. (2) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was justified in ignoring the provisions of Section 68 when such interpretation by the ITAT would result in serious curtailment of powers of Section 68. (3) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.77,80,000/- without appreciating that the assessee himself declared the sale consideration of Rs.22,20,000/- as per the registered deed and there was no evidence on record that the purchase had given total consideration of Rs.1,20,00,000/-. (4) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in not testing the case of the assessee on the anvil of the provisions of Section 68. (5) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.77,80,000/- without appreciating that the assessee had grossly failed to discharge its onus to prove the source of cash deposit in its banks account." 3. The assessee voluntarily filed return on 17.10.2008 disclosing total income of Rs.64,188/- and agricultural income of Rs.1,25,000/-. On receipt of certain information that the assessee had deposited an amount of Rs.1,08,32,752/- in bank account no.4621 with Syndicate Bank, Village Dehra, Tehsil Hapur, enquiries were made and statements of the assessee and purchasers were recorded.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492