| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 1667 2015 SLD 1667 (2015) 112 TAX 375 |
W.P. No. 920 of 2014, decision dated: 16-7-2015, hearing DATE : 30-6-2015.
MUHAMMAD SAJID MEHMOOD SETHI, J.
Mansoor Usman Awan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Zahid Saleem Advocate, for the respondent and petitioner in W.P. No. 3333 of 2007. Muhammad Irfan Wain, Advocate, for the petitioner in W.P. No. 3086 of 2007. Muhammad Akhtar Khan, Advocate, f
ENGRO FOODS LTD.
VS
C. D. G. etc.
Law: Punjab Local Govt, Ordinance, 2001)
Section: 190,145,116,39(b),54(i)(g),116,item11,pa rt-II of Second Schedule
Law: Punjab Local Govt, Ordinance, 2001)
Section: 190,145,116,39(b),54(i)(g),116,item11,pa rt-II of Second Schedule
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 4,9,18,23,24,25
Law: Punjab Local Government Act, 2013
Section: 143
Punjab Local Government Act 2013 - Section: 143 - Punjab Local Govt. Ordinance, 2001 - Sections 190, 145, 116, 39(b), 54(i)(g) and 116 read with item 11, part-II of Second Schedule - Notification No. 807(E&T), 20-06-2012 - Punjab Local Govt. Taxation Rules, 2001, Rules: 8&9 - Advertisement bylaws, 2013 - Punjab Local Govt. (Appeals) Rules, 2000- Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 - Constitutional petition - Imposition of advertisement fee by City District Government (Respondent No. 1) on sign board installed by petitioner in front of shop/offices for publicity of product "Omore Ice Cream" - issuance of demand notice by Respondent No. 2&3 (contractors of Respondent No. 1) demanding sum under the head advertisement charges on account of various advertisements displayed on face of its commercial concerns and threat of forceful removal of petitioner's sign boards and confiscation thereof - Validity - Alternate remedy - Concept of - Whether High Court has already settled that petitioners had alternate remedy of appeal u/s 190 of Punjab local Government Ordinance, 2001 as well as Punjab Local Govt. (Appeals) Rules, 2002, which has not been availed in instant cases - Held yes - Whether in view of of apex court in C.A. Nos. 1764 to 1782 of 2005, these writ petitions are not maintainable - Held yes - Whether petitioners are allowed to avail remedy of appeal before proper forum within 20 days from today and meanwhile no coercive measures will be taken against petitioners to enable them to approach appropriate forum - Held Yes. Cases referred to: Coca Cola Beverages etc. v. Cantonment Board Chaklala, Rawalpindi & others (2011 MLD 1987); Coca Cola Beverages Pakistan Limited through Company Secretary v. City District Government, Rawalpindi through DCO and others (2014 CLC 1135); Federation of Pakistan through Secretary M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another v. Durrani Ceramics and others (2014 SCMR 1630); Dubai Islamic Bank Pakistan Ltd, through authorized attorneys v. Federation of Pakistan, through Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi and 2 others (2014 MLD 957); Lucky Cement Factory Limited and others v. The Government of N.W.F.P. through Secretary, Local…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492