| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 297 2015 SLD 297 2015 PLC 201 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 34 of 2012, decided on 7th April, 2014.(On appeal against the judgment dated 5-4-2011 passed by the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad, in W.P. No. 4738 of 2010)
NASIR-UL-MULK, SARMAD, JALAL OSMANY AND AMIR HANI MUSLIM, JJ
Shoaib Shaheen, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Sohail Mehmood, DAG and Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 34 of 2012, decided on 7th April, 2014.(On appeal against the judgment dated 5-4-2011 passed by the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad, in W.P. No. 4738 of 2010)
NASIR-UL-MULK, SARMAD, JALAL OSMANY AND AMIR HANI MUSLIM, JJ
Shoaib Shaheen, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Sohail Mehmood, DAG and Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents
Peer MUKARRAMULHAQ
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 48(1),189,190,212(3),148(1)
Law: Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977
Section: 5
Law: Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000)
Section: 3(1)(a)
Law: Civil Servants Act, 1973
Section: 23
(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 48(1), 189, 190 & 212(3)---Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), S. 23---Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977, R. 5---Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), S. 3(1)(a) [since repealed]---Constitutional obligation of the President of Pakistan to ensure implementation of the s of the Supreme Court---Scope---Dismissal of civil servant from service attaining finality after of Supreme Court---President ordering re-instatement of such civil servant on grounds of hardship under S. 23 of Civil Servants Act, 1973---Legality and effect---President nullifying findings of the Supreme Court---Civil servant in question was dismissed from service on charge of un-authorized absence from duty---Civil servant preferred departmental appeal under S. 23 of Civil Servants Act, 1973 before the President (competent authority), which remained undecided---Consequently civil servant filed appeal before the Service Tribunal, which was allowed, however Supreme Court in its appellate jurisdiction maintained penalty of dismissal from service---Such of the Supreme Court attained finality---Subsequent to Supreme Court's civil servant preferred second appeal/review to the President under S. 23 of Civil Servants Act, 1973, which was ultimately allowed, and civil servant was reinstated in service---Held, such order by the President was per se violative of the of the Supreme Court given under Art. 212(3) of the Constitution, whereby penalty of dismissal from service was maintained---Such order by the President (competent authority) offended Art. 190 of the Constitution, which mandated that all executive and judicial authorities shall act in aid of the Supreme Court---Civil servant had already availed the right of appeal against his dismissal from service in terms of R.5 of Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977---Civil servant having exhausted his remedy of appeal in the original proceedings (before the Service Tribunal and the Supreme Court), could not in law, file a second appeal and/or review under S. 23 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, as such appeal/review would offend the provisions of Art. 212(3) of the Constitution---Findings…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492