| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1973 SLG 371 1973 SLD 371 1973 PCRLJ 395 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 413 of 1970, 18th December, 1972
IMDAD ALI H. AGHA, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Criminal Appeal No. 413 of 1970, 18th December, 1972
IMDAD ALI H. AGHA, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Budho
VS
The State
Law:
Section:
Keywords: Set Aside, House Breaking, Conviction, Trial Court, Place, Order, Possession, Theft, Failure, Retrial, Parties, Legality, Property, Prosecution, Evidence Result: Appeal accepted JUDGMENT Appellant Budho has been convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tharparkar at Sangbar under section 411, P. P.C. And sentenced to one year R. I. 2. The allegation on which he has been convicted is that on or about the night between 4th and 5th of June 1968, at Deh Mooi, Taluka Shahadadpur he committed house breaking into the Kot of the complainant Abdul Rehman which was used as human dwelling after the hour of sun set and before the hour of sun-rise in order to commit theft and in fact theft of three goats belonging to the complainant Abdul Rehman was committed which ace found by the trial Court to have been recovered from the possession of the appellant on which charge he has, therefore, been convicted and sentenced as aforesaid. 3. The prosecution examined five witnesses who are mashir P. W. Nawab (P. W. 1), Ibrahim (P. W. 2), Police Constable Muhammad Bilawal (P. W. 3), A. S. I. Kalandar Bux (P. W. 4) and A.S. I. P. Mohammed Rafique (P. W. 5) while statement of than complainant, Abdul Rehman which was recorded in the committal Court was brought on record of the trial Court under section 33 of the Evidence Act as the complainant was not traceable as his whereabouts were not known. Although the above-mentioned six witnesses' evidence has been placed on record by the prosecution but from none of them has said that the alleged recovered, goats, the subject-matter of the theft, were produced before the trial Court and marked as Article number or Exhibit number which is usually done in criminal cases of this kind. Since the property involved in the crime has not been produced at the trial and marked as an Article number or Exhibit number it has been argued by the learned counsel for the appellant, that in such an eventuality where is the assurance that in fact the theft of the alleged three goats of the complainant had taken place and they were subsequently recovered from the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492