| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 171 2015 SLD 171 2015 SCMR 615 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No.83 of 2011, decision dated: 8-01-2015 (On appeal from the judgment/order dated 4-2-2010 in C.R. No.76 of 2010 passed by the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi)
JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA AND QAZI FAEZ ISA, JJ
Ch. Mushtaq Ahmed Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Sardar Muhammad Aslam, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rafaqat Hussain, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent
Civil Appeal No.83 of 2011, decision dated: 8-01-2015 (On appeal from the judgment/order dated 4-2-2010 in C.R. No.76 of 2010 passed by the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi)
JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA AND QAZI FAEZ ISA, JJ
Ch. Mushtaq Ahmed Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Sardar Muhammad Aslam, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rafaqat Hussain, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent
Raja MUHAMMAD ARSHAD
VS
Raja RABNAWAZ
Law: Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1991
Section: 13
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 12(2)
(a) Contract Act (IX of 1872)--- ----Ss. 201 & 208---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908). S. 12(2)---Punjab Pre-emption Act (IX of 1991), S. 13---Registered power-of-attorney, cancellation of---Scope---Cancellation neither registered nor on a stamp paper---Effect of such cancellation with regard to third parties---Pre-emptor/appellant had filed a suit for pre-emption against the vendee---Suit was dismissed by Trial Court---Pre-emptor filed an appeal before appellate court, during pendency of which agent/attorney of vendee recorded his statement in Appellate Court to the effect that both parties had entered into a compromise---Appellate court decreed the suit for pre-emption on basis of such compromise---Subsequently vendee filed an application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. contending that the compromise was invalid because he had cancelled his attorney's power-of-attorney before he made the compromising statement before Appellate Court---Validity---Vendee did not deny that a registered power-of-attorney was indeed executed by him in favour of his attorney/agent---Cancellation of power-of-attorney was neither registered nor was it on stamp paper, in fact such cancellation was on a plain piece of paper---Pre-emptor was a third person who had no notice of the cancellation of the power-of-attorney by the vendee---Pre-emptor could not be burdened with any notice of any cancellation of the power-of-attorney---Appeal filed by vendee was dismissed accordingly. Raza Munir and another v. Mst. Sardar Bibi and 3 others 2005 SCMR 1315 and Muhammad Ali Razi Khan v. Muhammad Ali Zaki Khan and others 2007 MLD 54 distinguished. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 12(2)---Decree challenged on the plea of fraud---Person against whom fraud alleged---Necessary party, impleadment of---Scope---Section 12(2), C.P.C. was a substitute for a separate/independent suit for setting aside of a decree---Application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. had all the relevant attributes of a suit and therefore, the person against whom an allegation of fraud was made was a necessary party and must be impleaded in the application as a -Respondent. ORDER JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, J. ---We have heard this case at…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492