| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 982 2014 SLD 982 2014 YLR 2284 |
Peshawar High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 35-B of 2014, decision & hearing Dated: 14-04-2014.
MUHAMMAD DAUD KHAN, JUSTICE
Muhammad Rasheed Khan Dirma Khel for Petitioners. Qudratullah Khan Gandapur A.A.G. for the State. Faqir Mehboobul Hameed for the Complainant.
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 35-B of 2014, decision & hearing Dated: 14-04-2014.
MUHAMMAD DAUD KHAN, JUSTICE
Muhammad Rasheed Khan Dirma Khel for Petitioners. Qudratullah Khan Gandapur A.A.G. for the State. Faqir Mehboobul Hameed for the Complainant.
JUMA KHAN AND ANOTHERS
VS
THE STATE AND 3 OTHERS
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497,497(2)
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 148,149,201,202,302
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497--- Bail--- Appreciation of evidence---Deeper appreciation of evidence was unwarranted at bail stage. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497(2)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 201, 202, 148, 149---Qatl-e-amd, causing disappearance of evidence of offence, intentional omission to give information of offence by a person bound to inform, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Probability of false implication---No independent witnesses---Different versions of the same occurrence---Rule of consistency---Effect---Dead body of deceased-lady was found from the house of the accused, who was her real uncle---Two sisters of deceased were already residing with the accused---Deceased had allegedly also received firearm injuries but no one from the locality neighbourhood came forward to depose about the occurrence, thus there was no independent witness---Inimical terms between the parties were admitted, hence false implication of accused could not be ruled out---Three versions of the occurrence were put forward, one by the accused side, one by the complainant side and one by the investigation officer---Question as to which version was correct was to be answered by the Trial Court---Co-accused had already been released on bail, and she was alleged the same role as the accused---Case was one of further inquiry---Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances. (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Bail---Grant/refusal of---Grounds---Offence of heinous nature entailing capital punishment---Effect---Such ground alone shall not be considered as an impediment in the grant of bail---Key test was that on basis of other attending circumstances, a good case was prima facie made out. (d) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497--- Bail--- Accused apparently entitled to bail, refused such concession---Effect---Refusal in granting bail to such an accused would amount to unjustified incarceration with no proper reparation. Tarim Bashier and 5 others v. The State PLD 1995 SC 34 and Riaz Jafar Natiq v. The State 2011 SCMR 1708 rel. THIS JUDGMENT…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492