| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 293 2013 SLD 293 2013 PTD 412 |
Federal Tax Ombudsman
Complaint No.683/LHR/ST/(139)/1217 of 2012, decision dated: 11-09-2012
DR. MUHAMMAD SHOAIB SUDDLE, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN
Haji Ahmad, Advisor Dealing Officer. Sh. Ghulam Asghar for Authorized Representative. Saleem Akhtar, DCIR Departmental Representative
Complaint No.683/LHR/ST/(139)/1217 of 2012, decision dated: 11-09-2012
DR. MUHAMMAD SHOAIB SUDDLE, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN
Haji Ahmad, Advisor Dealing Officer. Sh. Ghulam Asghar for Authorized Representative. Saleem Akhtar, DCIR Departmental Representative
ECONOMY PESTICIDES CHOTI ZAREEN, DERA GHAZI KHAN
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 7,45A
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---Ss. 7 & 45A---Determination of tax liability---Adjustment of input tax against purchases---According to information available with Federal Board of Revenue, such purchases were not declared in the sales tax return of the supplier---Bank statement and copies of cheques/ demand drafts/pay orders were provided in response to show-cause notice and claimed that payment to supplier was made through bank in terms of S.73 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Clearance of cheques was not reflected in the bank statement---Complainant was required to provide sales tax return of the supplier, which he did not do---Order-in-original was passed for payment of tax along with penalty---Complainant contended that valid invoices were issued by the supplier and the payment was made through bank; that bank statement and copies of invoices were not considered on merits; that requirement to produce sales tax return of the supplier was uncalled for; that such document ought to have been obtained directly from the supplier instead of compelling the complainant; and that orders-in-original were passed without considering the evidence or going for independent verification, which was tantamount to maladministration---Validity---Inland Revenue Officer observed that cheques/demand drafts/pay order were not reflected in the bank statement---Taxation Officer should have verified the transactions directly from the bank which had not been done---No verification of purchases was made from the supplier and instead order-in-original was passed arbitrarily---Such act of passing orders-in-original was tantamount to maladministration---Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that Federal Board of Revenue direct the Chief Commissioner to invoke jurisdiction under S. 45A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, to pass a fresh speaking order, as per law. FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS DR. MUHAMMAD SHOAIB SUDDLE (FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN).---This complaint is filed against unlawful order-in-original dated 13-7-2012. 2. According to the Department, the complainant adjusted input tax of Rs.381,088 during tax period 12 of 2011 against purchases made from the supplier namely Messrs ICI Pakistan Limited. As…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492