| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 2399 2015 SLD 2399 2015 PCRLJ 1153 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 70 and Murder Reference 18 of 2010, heard on 29th April, 2014.
ABDUL SAMI KHAN AND SYED SHAHBAZ ALI RIZVI, JJ
Sarfraz Ali Khan for Appellant. Basharat Ullah Khan for the Complainant. Ch. Qaiser Mushtaq, A.D.P.P. for the State
Criminal Appeal No. 70 and Murder Reference 18 of 2010, heard on 29th April, 2014.
ABDUL SAMI KHAN AND SYED SHAHBAZ ALI RIZVI, JJ
Sarfraz Ali Khan for Appellant. Basharat Ullah Khan for the Complainant. Ch. Qaiser Mushtaq, A.D.P.P. for the State
SHAUKAT HAYAT
VS
The STATE
Law:
Section:
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302 & 452--- Qatl-i-amd, house-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault, wrongful restraint--- Appreciation of evidence---Night-time occurrence was reported by single eye-witness against unknown accused with considerable, inordinate and unexplained delay--- Accused was nominated subsequently on the basis of Wajjtakkar evidence only---Complainant who was also eye-witness did not identify the accused; she nominated the accused on the basis of information given to her by given up witness---Complainant claimed that she was the first cousin of accused and mentioned his features but did not recognize him---Deceased was shot from a close range but no blackening was found around the injury---FIR was registered with a delay of six hours yet accused was not nominated---Delay adversely affected the credibility of prosecution version leading to inference that occurrence was not witnessed by any one--- Witness of Wajjtakkar had been given up by prosecution; adverse inference could be drawn that such witness would not have supported the prosecution witness---Prosecution failed to prove the evidence of Wajjtakkar---No motive was attributed in FIR---Motive attributed by complainant subsequently was not supported by other prosecution witnesses---Recovery of empties was of no value where other pieces of evidence had been disbelieved---Private witness of recovery of pistol was not produced before trial Court---Prosecution failed to discharge its responsibility to prove the charge beyond shadow of doubt---Not many doubts but a single doubt in prudent mind was sufficient to acquit accused---Accused was acquitted. Akhtar Ali and others v. The State 2008 SCMR 6; Nazeer Ahmad v. Gehne Khan 2011 SCMR 1473; Lal Khan v. The State 2006 SCMR 1846; Nasir Jamal and 2 others v. The State 2006 PCr.LJ 557; Mst. Mumtaz and others v. The State 1999 MLD 988; Sajid Mumtaz and others v. Basharat and others 2006 SCMR 231; Azhar Iqbal v. The State 2013 SCMR 383 and Mst. Shamshad v. The State 1998 SCMR 854 rel. JUDGMENT SYED SHAHBAZ ALI RIZVI, J.---This judgment will dispose of above captioned Murder Reference as well as Criminal Appeal filed by Shaukat Hayat…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492