| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 1883 2014 SLD 1883 (2014) 368 ITR 42 |
Supreme Court of India
Transferred Case (C) Nos. 116 to 118 & 150 of 2006 CivilAppeal Nos. 3850, 3862, 3881,3882,4051 & 4052 of 2006 WritPetition (C) Nos. 621 & 697 of 2007, SEPTEMBER 25, 2014
R.M. LODHA, CJI, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. CHELAMESWAR, A.K. SIKRI AND R.F. NARIMAN, JJ
Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General Arijit Prasad, B.V. Balaram Das, Nikhil Nayyar, P. Parmeswaran, D.S. Mahra, K.C. Dua, Shibashish Misra, Rustom B. Hathikhanawala, E.C. Vidya Sagar and Pramod Dayal Advocates for the Petitioner. P. Parmeswaran, Ardhendumauli
Transferred Case (C) Nos. 116 to 118 & 150 of 2006 CivilAppeal Nos. 3850, 3862, 3881,3882,4051 & 4052 of 2006 WritPetition (C) Nos. 621 & 697 of 2007, SEPTEMBER 25, 2014
R.M. LODHA, CJI, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. CHELAMESWAR, A.K. SIKRI AND R.F. NARIMAN, JJ
Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General Arijit Prasad, B.V. Balaram Das, Nikhil Nayyar, P. Parmeswaran, D.S. Mahra, K.C. Dua, Shibashish Misra, Rustom B. Hathikhanawala, E.C. Vidya Sagar and Pramod Dayal Advocates for the Petitioner. P. Parmeswaran, Ardhendumauli
Madras Bar Associationv.Union of India
Law:
Section:
JUDGMENT The Controversy : Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. - All the above cases are being disposed of by this common judgment. The issue which arises for consideration before us, in the present bunch of cases, pertains to the constitutional validity of the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as, the NTT Act). Simultaneously, the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 has been assailed, by asserting, that the same violates the basic structure of the Constitution of India (hereinafter referred to as, the Constitution), by impinging on the power of "judicial review" vested in the High Court. In the event of this Court not acceding to the aforementioned prayers, a challenge in the alternative, has been raised to various provisions of the NTT Act, which has led to the constitution of the National Tax Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as, the NTT). The NTT, according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, is styled as a quasi-judicial appellate tribunal. It has been vested with the power of adjudicating appeals arising from orders passed by Appellate Tribunals (constituted under the Income Tax Act, the Customs Act, 1962, and the Central Excise Act, 1944). Hitherto before, the instant jurisdiction was vested with High Courts. The pointed issue canvassed in this behalf is, that High Courts which discharge judicial functions, cannot be substituted by an extra-judicial body. Additionally, it is maintained that the NTT in the manner of its constitution undermines a process of independence and fairness, which are sine qua non of an adjudicatory authority. The Historical Perspective: The Income Tax Legislation, in India: 2. (i) Law relating to income tax dates back to 1860, when legislation pertaining to levy of tax on income, was introduced in India for the first time. The original enactment was replaced by subsequent legislations, enacted in 1865, 1886, 1918 and 1922. The Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as, the 1922 Act) was brought about, as a result of the recommendations of the All India Tax Committee. The 1922 Act can be described as a milestone in the evolution of direct tax laws inβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492