| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 332 2015 SLD 332 2015 PLC 411 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 6735 of 2014, decided on 29th October, 2014
SHAH KHAWAR, J
Qamar-uz-Zaman Butt for Petitioner. Jahanngir Ali Sheikh for
Respondent. Haji Muhammad Aslam Legal Advisor for
Respondents. Malik Muhammad Bashir Lakhesir, Asstt. A.G
Writ Petition No. 6735 of 2014, decided on 29th October, 2014
SHAH KHAWAR, J
Qamar-uz-Zaman Butt for Petitioner. Jahanngir Ali Sheikh for
Respondent. Haji Muhammad Aslam Legal Advisor for
Respondents. Malik Muhammad Bashir Lakhesir, Asstt. A.G
Dr. RAB NAWAZ MALIK
VS
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Law: Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974
Section: 22
(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199---Punjab Civil .Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974, R.22---Constitutional petition---Civil Service---Regularization of ad hoc appointment of the petitioner against the post of Senior Registrar (Surgery) (BS-18) on the basis of length of service---Scope---"Ad hoc appointment" and "appointment by promotion"---Distinction elaborated---Petitioner was aggrieved of his termination and promotion of respondent as Senior Registrar Surgery (BS-18) on acting charge basis by respondent's adjustment against the post vacated by termination of ad hoc appointment of petitioner---Validity---Respondent's promotion on the recommendation of Departmental Promotion Committee created a vested right in his favour and such incumbent could be promoted to the higher scale on availability of a vacant post, which was admittedly occupied by the petitioner as a stop-gap arrangement---Respondent after having been promoted was adjusted against the said post, which had not infringed any of the Fundamental Rights of the petitioner---Promotion of respondent against the post of Senior Registrar Surgery (BS-18) was to be considered as a regular appointment and petitioner could not claim continuation of his ad hoc appointment against the post in presence of promotion of respondent on the recommendations of a duly constituted departmental promotion committee as approved by the competent authority---Constitutional petition was declined in circumstances. Dr. Naveeda Tufail and 72 others v. Government of Punjab and others 2003 SCMR 291; Ghulam Sarwar v. Province of Punjab 1982 SCMR 46 and Muhammad Ashraf v. Government of Punjab PLJ 1998 Tr.C. (Services) 77 ref. (b) Civil service--- ----"Ad hoc" and "Acting charge"---Meaning and connotation---Word "ad hoc" itself reflected that an incumbent was holding the charge as stop-gap arrangement as the vacant post was not filled up through due process---Word "acting charge" had wider connotation, as a person performing duties on acting charge basis exercised full powers of the office and could not be considered to be appointed on the basis of stop-gap arrangement. ORDER SHAH KHAWAR, J.---…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492