Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 1087 2015 SLD 1087 2015 YLR 2719
Sindh High Court
IInd Appeal No. 61 of 2012, decision Date : 28-05-2015,hearing Date : 30-04-2015.
SADIQ HUSSAIN BHATTI, JUSTICE
S. Irtiza Hussain Ziadi for Appellant No. 1.Riaz Alam Khan for Appellant No. 2.Muhammad Farooq for
Respondent No. 1.S. Kamran Shahzad Siddiqui for KMC.Muhammad Ali Raz for KBCA.Muhammad Arshad Warsi for
Respondent No. 4.Salman Hamid for Respon

WORKS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND ANOTHERVSMRS. NAJMA SALEEM AND 4 OTHERS

Law:

Section:

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 42---Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S. 52---Suit for declaration---Lease of land---Conversion of plot from residential to commercial---Plot in question was for residential purpose only and was not to be diverted to other use without previous consent in writing of the lessor and Housing Society---Private person could not produce a copy of such document which was not in his custody---No letter was written by the lessee to the Housing Society for conversion of plot from residential to commercial---Lessee did not acquire leasehold rights of a commercial plot---Letter for conversion of plot from residential to commercial produced by the defendants was forged and manipulated---Both the courts below had failed to read evidence correctly and findings given by them were totally against the evidence on record---Plot in question was not converted from residential to commercial---If an area/road was declared commercial by operation of law, there was no need to obtain any fresh/separate permission for change or use of land/plot in such area or on such road---If suit property was alienated by defendants during pendency of suit, such alienation/transfer would not be hit by provisions of S. 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, however, passed in the present case would be binding on any subsequent buyer---Impugned s passed by both the courts below suffered from misreading, non-reading and mis-conception of the evidence available on record which were set aside and case was remanded to the Trial Court for decision afresh on the basis of material on record---Appeal was accepted in circumstances. Basit Sibtain through L.Rs. v. Muhammad Sharif through L.Rs. 2004 SCMR 578; Abdus Saeed Khan and others v. Basharat Ali and others PLD 1995 Lah. 255; Muhammad Yousuf and others v. Muhammad Younas and others 1995 CLC 1780; PLD 2010 Kar. 374 and 2001 SCMR 279 ref. Mst. Tabassum Shaheen v. Mst. Uzma Rahat 2012 SCMR 983; Lalji Singh v. Rameshuwar Misra 1983 9 All LR 269 and Alamdar Hussain v. Nazar Hussain and others 2004 SCMR 595 rel. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: SADIQ HUSSAIN BHATTI, JUSTICE:---.--- The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register