Case Details

Citation(s)
2014 SLG 1535 2014 SLD 1535 2014 PTD 1807 2014 PTCL 726
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.5047 of 2012, decision dated: 19-09-2013.dates of hearing: 9th, 12th, 17th, 18th and 19-09-2013
SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH AND MAMOON RASHID SHEIKH, JJ

TAJ INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. and othersVsFEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others

Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990

Section: 37A,37B

(a) Taxation--- ----Tax law---Purpose---Civil and criminal---Collection of tax---Punishment/deterrence---Tax was a fiscal tool to regulate the monetary policy of the State, hence, the primary focus of a tax law was the levy and collection of tax, however, as a white collar crime, tax evasion, etc had also been criminalized with the collateral effect of retribution and deterrence, in addition to achieving the fiscal incentives of the State---While assessment of tax liability was characteristically a civil proceeding, tax evasion or tax fraud, etc. could also be a tax crime and attracted both civil, as well as, criminal penalties---Under civil proceedings the tax was assessed and recovered as a compensation along with monetary penalties, while under criminal prosecution, tax evader was punished with imprisonment of fine or both. (b) Administration of justice--- ----Concurrent civil and criminal proceedings---Stay of criminal proceedings---Scope---Criminal and civil proceedings could co-exist and proceed side by side, in cases where the subject matter of both the proceedings was so closely interrelated, so that the outcome of the civil proceedings could have a material bearing on the criminal proceedings---Safer course, however in such a situation was to stay the criminal proceedings till the finalisation of the civil matter. Akhlaq Hussain Kayani v. Zafar Iqbal Kiyani and others 2010 SCMR 1835 and Muhammad Akbar v. The State and others PLD 1968 SC 281 rel. (c) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 11, 37A & 72B---Self-assessed taxpayer---Tax evasion---Selection for criminal prosecution---Scope---Section 37A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 could be employed to select or pick a taxpayer out of the pool of self-assessed taxpayers to undergo criminal prosecution without first carrying out an objective selection process of audit followed by assessment of tax under S. 11 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Criminal prosecution, generally, had no nexus with assessment of tax liability and could not be equated with cases selected for audit---While self-assessment scheme guarded the sanctity of self-assessed sales tax returns it afforded no protection to a criminal act committed…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492