Case Details

Citation(s)
1973 SLG 294 1973 SLD 294 (1973) 28 TAX 40 1973 PTD 465 1973 PLD 849
Lahore High Court
Civil Reference No. 65 of 1967, decided on 14-5-1973
MUHAMMAD AKRAM AND MUHAMMAD AFZAL CHEEMA, JJ
Sh. Abdul Haq, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Malik Muhammad Nawaz, Advocate,
Respondent

COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax, NORTH ZONE, Lahore

VS

RIPPON PRINTERS PRESS, Lahore

Law: Income Tax Act, 1922

Section: 66(1),26A,23(5),2(14)

Income-tax Act, 1922 -Section 26A(1) (after amendment in 1965) -- Provisions of Sec. 26A whether procedural -Held yes -Amendments introduced in the section in 1965 -Whether also procedural -Held yes -Whether remedial and curative in character -Held yes -Whether retrospective in operation and applicable in respect of pending assessments and pending appeals -Held yes -- Firm -Not a legal entity under the law but an assessable unit and chargeable as a distinct entity under the Income-tax Act -Registration of firm under the Partnership Act or the Registration Act does not ensure for the purposes of the Income-tax Act -- Firm -Registration -Partnership deed -Creation of firm by virtue of instrument of partnership in writing -Whether necessary for purposes of registration -Held no -Instrument of partnership executed in writing sometime before the end of the previous year relevant to the assessment year -Whether registration allowable for the whole year -Held yes -Firm satisfying the requirements of sub-section (1) of Sec. 26A and the relevant rules -Question whether the firm was created orally or had come into existence from before the date of the instrument or not -Whether material for purposes of registration -Held no -- Interpretation -Under amended section firm need not have been created by instrument of partnership in writing save that instrument of partnership must be executed in writing before and of previous year -Amendment applicable retrospectively to applications and appeals arising therefrom pending on date of amendment -- Interpretation of statutes -Procedural law -Amendment -Alteration in procedure, retrospective in absence of good reason for holding to contrary -- JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by MUHAMMAD AKRAM J.--In this case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Pakistan), Lahore has referred the following question of law to the High Court at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, North Zone, Lahore, under Section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act XI of 1922:-- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the partnership deed dated 23-7-1956 created a valid partnership for the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492