| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2015 SLG 374 2015 SLD 374 2015 CLC 1 |
Sindh High Court
C.M.A. No. 13528 of 2012 in Suit No. 1599 of 2012, decidedon 11th June, 2013. dates of hearing: 11th, 25th March, 13thand 27th May, 2013
MUNIB AKHTAR, J
M. Farogh Naseem and Jamshed Malik for Applicant. Khalid Latif and Saif Malik along with Arshad Warsi for
Respondent.
C.M.A. No. 13528 of 2012 in Suit No. 1599 of 2012, decidedon 11th June, 2013. dates of hearing: 11th, 25th March, 13thand 27th May, 2013
MUNIB AKHTAR, J
M. Farogh Naseem and Jamshed Malik for Applicant. Khalid Latif and Saif Malik along with Arshad Warsi for
Respondent.
PAK TURK ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD.vsTURK HAVA YOLLARI (TURKISH AIRLINES INC.)
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: O.VII,R.11,O.XXIX,R.1
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 201
Law: Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.)
Section: 196
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VII, R. 11 & O. XXIX, R. 1---Sindh Chief Court Rules (O.S.), R.196---Suit by company through its officer---Non-filing with plaint the resolution of plaintiff company's Board of Directors authorizing such officer to institute suit---Defendant's application under O.VII, R.11, C.P.C. seeking rejection of plaint for suit not having been filed through a duly authorized person---Validity---Plaint found mention that suit had been filed by duly authorised person being conversant with facts of case---Every fact stated in plaint would be taken as true and correct for consideration of plaint---Rule of "indoor management" would apply to the present case, wherein defendant was a third party---Memorandum and Articles of Association of plaintiff Company would require examination, whereas production of Board's resolution would not be essential, which might be produced by way of abundant caution---Defendant's objection was not based on non-production of Articles of Association, which being a public document might be produced at any time for examination and consideration by court---Plaintiff could not be penalized for non-production of Board's resolution along with plaint---Plaint could not be rejected on basis of such objection of defendant for having factual element and also while assuming averments made in plaint to be true and correct---High Court dismissed such application in circumstances. Muhammad Siddiq Muhammad Umar and another v. Australasia Bank Ltd. PLD 1966 SC 685; Ifthikhar Hussain Khan of Mamdot v. Ghulam Nabi Corporation Ltd. PLD 1971 SC 550; National Insurance Corporation and others v. Pakistan National Shipping Corporation and others 2006 CLD 85; Dumez Borie v. International Forwarders Ltd. NLR 1983 UC 184; Abdul Rahim and others v. United Bank Ltd. PLD 1997 Kar. 62; Standard Hotels (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Rio Centre and others 1994 CLC 2413; Dr. S.M. Rab v. National Refinery Ltd. and another PLD 2005 Kar. 478; Abubakar Saley Mayet v. Abbot Laboratories and another 1987 CLC 367; Government of Pakistan v. Premier Sugar Mills and others PLD 1991 Lah. 381; National Bank of Pakistan and others v. Karachi Development…