Case Details

Citation(s)
2014 SLG 1062 2014 SLD 1062 2014 CLD 222
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petitions Nos. D-1272, D-1970 and D-3410 of2010, decided on 24th October, 2013.
SAJJAD ALI SHAH AND AQEEL AHMED ABBASI, JJ
Abid S. Zuberi for Petitioner (in Constitutional Petition No.D-1272 of 2010). �Sher Muhammad K. Sheikh, Additional AG for
Respondents Nos. 1, 6 and 7 (in Constitutional Petition No.D-1272 of 2010). �Manzoor Ahmed and Mrs. Azra Moqueem for
Respondents Nos.

SALIM GODIL and others

VS

PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary and others

Law: Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997

Section: 2(xxxxv),12,33

(a) Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (XXXIV of 1997)---   ----Ss. 2(xxxv), 12 33, Schedules II---Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency Review of Initial Environmental Examination and Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2000, Regln. 5---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199--- Constitutional petition--- Environmental assessment--- Commercialization---Withdrawal of permission---Security risk---Proof---Petitioners intended to raise commercial cum residential building on a commercial plot but District authorities withdrew the status of plot as commercial on the plea that it was security risk as a Jamat Khana (religious building) was in its vicinity---Validity---Withdrawal of commercialization status of plot on the ground that construction which would be raised on such plot would be a ‘security risk’ did not fall within the domain of District authorities---Building approval was an act subsequent to and independent of the status of the plot---Declaration of District authorities to such effect could not sustain unless it had statutory backing such as in the cases of key point installations all those structures, installations, factories or other establishments which were of vital importance to country in its readiness and ability to fight a war and the event of whose destruction or severe damage, the loss would impair vital national war effort---Provincial Government or Central Government had the prerogative to prohibit construction within a specified parameters for the safety of such construction/installation---Environmental Impact Studies presupposed planning and zoning---Once planning and zoning had taken place or changed then such entry could not be applied against the proponent of a project which had undertaken construction or installation in consonance to such change---Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency could require such proponent to file Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) or Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) by invoking any specific entry in either of the Schedules---Order passed by District Authorities to the extent of withdrawing commercial status of plot in question on the ground of being ‘security risk’ to Jamat Khana…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492