| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 915 2014 SLD 915 2014 PTD 2005 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.21824 of 2014, decision dated: 11-08-2014.
ATIR MAHMOOD, JUSTICE
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Writ Petition No.21824 of 2014, decision dated: 11-08-2014.
ATIR MAHMOOD, JUSTICE
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MESSRS MAGNA PROCESSING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, (REVENUE DIVISION) MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 2 OTHERS
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 45B,48
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 45B & 48---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Illegally claimed/received refund of input tax---Recovery notices---Pendency of appeal before Commissioner (Appeals), Inland Revenue---Suspension of recovery notices during pendency of appeal---High Court directed that revenue authorities could not recover the tax amount demanded from petitioner/tax payer till decision of his appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals); that Commissioner (Appeals) should decide the pending appeal of petitioner within 30 days in accordance with law through a speaking order after hearing all the necessary parties and that till such time the appeal was decided, the recovery notices shall remain suspended---Order accordingly. Central Board of Revenue v. Chanda Motors 1993 SCMR 39 and Sun Rise Bottling Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., v. Federation of Pakistan 2006 PTD 535 ref. ORDER ATIR AMAHMOOD, J.---The grievance of the petitioner is that his appeal is pending before respondent No.2 and has not come up for hearing as yet. Learned counsel states that during the pendency of his appeal, impugned notices dated 10-6-2014 and 8-7-2014 for the recovery of tax demand of Rs.1,826,032 have been served upon the petitioner. He states that he does not press this petition and would be satisfied if a direction is given to respondent No.3 to decide the appeal of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously. In this regard, he has relied upon the cases titled Central Board of Revenue v. Chanda Motors (1993 SCMR 39) and Sun Rise Bottling Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. v.Federation of Pakistan…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492