| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2012 SLG 506 2012 SLD 506 2012 CLC 679 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.25494 of 2011, decision dated: 8-12-2011
MALIK SHAHZAD AHMAD KHAN, J
Kh. Muhammad Saeed for Petitioner
Writ Petition No.25494 of 2011, decision dated: 8-12-2011
MALIK SHAHZAD AHMAD KHAN, J
Kh. Muhammad Saeed for Petitioner
AMANULLAH KHAN
VS
DISTRICT JUDGE and 3 others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199(1)
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199(1)
Law: Family Courts Act, 1964
Section: 13(3)(4),14(3)
(a) West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)-------S. 5, Sched., Ss.13 & 14---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Suit for recovery of maintenance allowance---Execution of decree---Suit for recovery of maintenance allowance filed by the plaintiff having finally been decreed, plaintiffs filed execution petition, which was allowed---Execution proceedings remained pending for a considerable period due to delaying tactics of the -debtor---Petitioner, who was father of the -debtor stood surety for payment of decretal amount---Petitioner paid Rs.10,000 and undertook to pay the remaining decretal amount in case of non-payment by the -debtor---Later on decretal amount having not been paid by the -debtor or the petitioner/surety, -debtor was finally arrested---Application filed by the petitioner/surety for discharge of his surety, had been dismissed by the Family Court and Appellate Court---Validity---Petitioner's contention was that as he himself was not -debtor and was merely a surety of -debtor, on arrest of -debtor, no further action could be taken against him, when he had performed his duty by producing the -debtor before the court---Contention of the petitioner was misconceived as petitioner did not stand surety for appearance of -debtor, but he stood surety for the payment of decretal amount---Petitioner, could not be absolved of his liability on account of arrest of -debtor---Action for recovery of decretal amount could validly be taken against petitioner/surety---No interference was required by High Court in impugned orders passed by the Family Court and Appellate Court below---Petition was dismissed. Nawazo v. The State 2004 SCMR 563; Ghulam Qadir Siyal v. The State 1997 PCr.LJ 554 and Mst. Maqsooda Mai v. Bukhat Ali and another 2007 MLD 1264 distinguished. (b) West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)--- ----S. 14(3)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Appeal against interim order---Petitioner in his constitutional petition had challenged an interim order of Executing Court---When the legislation had specifically prohibited the filing of appeal or revision against an interim order, filing of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492