Case Details

Citation(s)
2015 SLG 1205 2015 SLD 1205 2015 PLJ 598
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Crl. Appeal No. 688 of 2009, decision Dated: 24.02.2015.Hearing Date : 14.01.2015. (On appeal from the judgmentDated 26.05.2009 in Crl. A. No. 35/2004 and M.R. No. 56/2006passed by the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan)
IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY, JUSTICE, DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN, JUSTICE, QAZI FAEZ ISA, JUSTICE
Mr. Rizwan Ejaz, ASC for Appellant.Mr. Ahmed Raza Gillani, Addl. PG Punjab for State.

SAEED AHMEDVS STATE

Law:

Section:

Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302(b)--Conviction and sentence--Murdered of his wife--Sentence of death was converted into life imprisonment--Cause of death was asphyxia inducted by throttling--Ascribe motive to murder of deceased--Accused wanted to contract another marriage--Validity--Motive does not stand to reason as accused could have divorced his wife if she was not giving him permission to marry again--Deceased and accused were married not too long ago also undermines the motive--Prosecution narrative with respect to motive was rightly disbelieved by High Court, as consequence of which it reduced sentence of accused to life imprisonment--Accused having already got benefit does not merit any further concession--Appeal was dismissed. Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 (10 of 1984)-- ----Art. 117--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), S. 302(b)--conviction and sentence was converted into life imprisonment--Burden of proof--It is fundamental principle of law that burden of proof is on prosecution. Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 (10 of 1984)-- ----Art. 122--Evidence Act, 1872, S. 106--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), S. 302(b)--Conviction and sentence was converted into life imprisonment, challenge to--Murdering of his wife--Not participate in last rites and disappeared--Question of--Whether unreasonable conduct was of any consequence--Circumstantial evidence--Burden of proof--Accused did not offer an explanation as regards his conduct did not permit Court to even contemplate about any alternative theory which may be compatible with innocence of accused--If particular fact is especially within knowledge of any person burden of proving that fact is upon him--Prosecution had established its case against accused, eye-witnesses had deposed against him and medical evidence confirmed strangulation of deceased--Accused did not attend to last rites of his wife who had died whilst residing with him--Such circumstances corroborate prosecution case in absence of accused offering reasonable explanation for unnatural conduct. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: Qazi Faez Isa, J.- The appellant was convicted for murdering his wife Razia Bibi ("the deceased"). The case…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register