| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 2579 2014 SLD 2579 2014 YLR 1283 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeals Nos. 185-J, 534, P.S.L.A. No. 71, CriminalRevision No. 407 and Murder Reference No. 177 of 2009, heardon 10th July, 2013
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK AND MALIK SHAHZAD AHMAD KHAN, JJ
Syed Ejaz Qutab for Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No. 185-J of 2009). Zafar Iqbal Chohan for Appellant with Appellant in person (in Criminal Appeal No. 534 of 2009). Mirza Abid Majeed, Deputy Prosecutor-General for the State. Naseer-ud-Din Khan Nayyar and
Criminal Appeals Nos. 185-J, 534, P.S.L.A. No. 71, CriminalRevision No. 407 and Murder Reference No. 177 of 2009, heardon 10th July, 2013
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK AND MALIK SHAHZAD AHMAD KHAN, JJ
Syed Ejaz Qutab for Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No. 185-J of 2009). Zafar Iqbal Chohan for Appellant with Appellant in person (in Criminal Appeal No. 534 of 2009). Mirza Abid Majeed, Deputy Prosecutor-General for the State. Naseer-ud-Din Khan Nayyar and
GHULAM YASINVsThe STATE
Law:
Section:
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 324, 337-A(i),(ii), 337-F(i) & 337-L(2)---Qatl-e-amd, attempt to commit qatl-e-amd, causing Shajjah-i-Khafifah, Shajjah-i-Mudihah, causing damiyah, causing hurt---Appreciation of evidence---Case of two versions---Inordinate delay of fourteen hours in reporting the crime, had created serious dents in the prosecution story and had shattered the presence of the complainant at the place of occurrence---Doctor had stated that all injuries were caused by blunt weapons--- Both prosecution witnesses of ocular account, had made dishonest improvements before the Trial Court, in order to bring the ocular account in line with medical evidence---Prosecution witness, though was injured witness, but the injuries on his person would not mean that he uttered the whole truth---Said dishonest improvements made by the complainant and injured eye-witness, had created doubt qua the veracity of witnesses of the ocular account---When a witness improved his statement to strengthen the prosecution case; and the moment it was concluded that the improvement was made deliberately and with mala fide intention, the testimonies of such witness would not remain reliable---Medical evidence damaged the prosecution case, instead of advancing it---Recovery of hatchet at the instance of accused, was inconsequential, as no report of Chemical Examiner or Serologist qua the same was available on the file; and no evidence had been brought on record to the effect that the hatchet was ever deposited with the Moharrar of Police Station for its safe custody in the Malkhana---No specific motive was alleged by the complainant, in the F.I.R., private complaint or before the Trial Court---Prosecution had failed to connect accused persons with the commission of crime---Case being of two versions, court was to analyze the version put forth by prosecution first---Since, the prosecution evidence was doubtful in nature, there was no need to discuss defence plea taken by accused, as same was exculpatory in nature---Conviction and sentence awarded to accused persons vide impugned passed by the Trial Court, were set aside, accused were acquitted of the charge framed…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492