| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 28 2013 SLD 28 (2013) 108 TAX 414 2013 PTD 486 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No.D-2899 of 2010, decision dated: 28-11-2012
AQEEL AHMED ABBASI AND SADIQ HUSSAIN BHATTI, JJ
Muhammad Kaukab Sabah-ud-Din for Petitioner. Asaf Vardag and Dilawar Hussain, Standing Counsel for
Respondents
Constitutional Petition No.D-2899 of 2010, decision dated: 28-11-2012
AQEEL AHMED ABBASI AND SADIQ HUSSAIN BHATTI, JJ
Muhammad Kaukab Sabah-ud-Din for Petitioner. Asaf Vardag and Dilawar Hussain, Standing Counsel for
Respondents
Syed NUSRAT NASIR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others
Law: Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000
Section: 10,9
(a) Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)----Ss. 9 & 10---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the Federal Tax Ombudsman---Complaint against maladministration---Aggrieved person---Scope---Petitioner while performing his duties as Additional Collector (Preventive) Customs made order for release of a vehicle, which was later rescinded when the case was reopened by another officer---Subsequently, the owner of the vehicle made complaint of maladministration against the other officer before the Federal Tax Ombudsman, who dismissed the same but along with the dismissal, also made recommendations for removal of the petitioner from service on grounds of maladministration---Contention of the petitioner was that the impugned recommendations were coram non judice and illegal as no complaint was filed against the petitioner in respect of his order-in-original---Validity---No complaint of maladministration against petitioner was filed by an aggrieved person nor any reference against the petitioner by the President, Senate or National Assembly was made, in the present case---Neither any motion of the Supreme Court nor of a High Court was made during the course of any proceedings and no proceedings of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's own motion against the petitioner were initiated by the Federal Tax Ombudsman in the present case as was evident from the impugned order---Federal Tax Ombudsman while making recommendations against the petitioner had failed to follow the procedure under S.10 of the Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 as no notice was issued to the petitioner nor any opportunity was provided to him before making the impugned recommendations, which negated the principles of natural justice---Federal Tax Ombudsman had also failed to record any findings against the petitioner to the effect that as to how and what maladministration had been committed by him and in absence of such findings, recommendations made by the Federal Tax Ombudsman could be of no legal effect---Recommendations made by the Federal Tax Ombudsman against the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492