Case Details

Citation(s)
2014 SLG 2224 2014 SLD 2224 2014 PCRLJ 1441
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 99 and Murder Reference No. 65 of 2009, heard on 7th April, 2014
MAZHAR IQBAL SIDHU AND ARSHAD MAHMOOD TABASSUM, JJ
Mian Qamar-ud-Din Safeer and Rana Muhammad Asif Saeed for Appellant. Malik Saeed Ahmad Gumb for the Complainant. Hassan Mehmood Khan Tareen, Deputy Prosecutor-General for the State

MUHAMMAD AKMAL

VS

The STATE and another

Law:

Section:

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)-------S. 302(b)---Qatl-e-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence, reduction in---Matter having been reported promptly, there was no possibility of deliberations or consultations---No previous enmity had been found between the parties---No direct evidence of the motive existed, but on that score alone, the whole case could not be thrown away---Non-proof of the motive or disproof of it would not mean that the whole incident was doubtful---Presence of eye-witnesses, was not unusual at the place of occurrence because the deceased was an employee of the owner of the place where incident took place---No significant inconsistency had been noticed in medical evidence vis-a-vis its corroboration to ocular account---Recovery of the 'Toki' further corroborated the prosecution case being sharp edged weapon and the injuries were caused with the same kind of weapon---Report of the Chemical Examiner as to its blood-imbrued was in the affirmative---Prosecution had ably proved its case against accused beyond shadow of reasonable doubt---Circumstances existed to favour accused so as to extenuate the quantum of sentence from death to life imprisonment---While maintaining the conviction, death sentence was commuted to imprisonment for life with benefit of S.382-B, Cr.P.C. Muhammad Javed and another v. The State and others 2011 SCMR 1662 ref. JUDGMENT MAZHAR IQBAL SIDHU, J.---Muhammad Akmal appellant, in the appeal, as mentioned above, has impugned the punishing judgment of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mailsi dated 31-1-2009, whereby he along with his co-accused Allah Dewaya was tried in a complaint privately instituted under sections 302/34, P.P.C. emanating from a case registered vide F.I.R. No.533/07 dated 12-12-2007 under sections 302/34, P.P.C. at Police Station, City, Mailsi, District Vehari and punished as follows:-- Conviction Sentence Under section 302(b), P.P.C. Sentence of death as Ta'zir and to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.1,00,000 as required under section 544-A, Cr.P.C. to the legal heirs of the deceased Mumtaz Ahmad and in default whereof to further undergo six months' simple imprisonment as well as the same was ordered to be…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492