Case Details

Citation(s)
2014 SLG 2608 2014 SLD 2608 2014 PLD 696
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 2277 of 2006, decided on 8th April, 2014.
JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, IQBAL HAMEEDUR RAHMAN AND MUSHIR ALAM, JJ
Razzaq A. Mirza, Addl. A.G., Rai Muhammad Nawaz Kharal, Advocate Supreme Court and Mir Adam Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellants. Malik Muhammad Akram Khan Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents.

LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, SARGODHA and another

VS

MUHAMMAD SULTAN and another

Law:

Section:

(a) Land Acquisition Act ( I of 1894)--- ----S. 18(1)---Acquisition of land---Compensation---Enhancement in compensation by Referee Court---Acquiring authority proceeded ex parte by Referee Court---Incumbent for landowner to prove his assertion despite ex parte proceedings against acquiring authority---Referee Court enhanced compensation for acquired land after proceedings ex parte against acquiring authority---Legality---Acquiring authority was proceeded against ex parte and had not led evidence in rebuttal to the testimony of landowners and their witness---Landowners could not be awarded an enhanced sum on such basis, as it was incumbent upon the landowners to prove their assertions---Illustration. (b) Land Acquisition Act ( I of 1894)--- ----S. 18(1)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 59---Acquisition of land---Compensation---Enhancement of compensation by Referee Court by relying on opinion of a non-expert witness---Legality---Independent witness appearing on behalf of landowners merely expressed an opinion as to the value of land acquired---Said witness was neither an expert nor he had established any basis for the opinion expressed by him---Order whereby Referee Court enhanced compensation was thus not based on admissible evidence---Case was remanded to Referee Court for decision afresh---Appeal was allowed accordingly. (c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Art. 59---Expert opinion---Evidentiary value---Under Art. 59 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, opinion of a witness was only relevant and carried some probative value if he was an expert in the fields specified in the said Article---For the purpose of giving an opinion, the witness first had to establish the expertise vested in him whether on account of academic qualification or experience or otherwise---Without such foundation, an opinion could not by itself be taken as having evidentiary value for proving a fact in issue. ORDER JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, J.--This appeal arises out of a land acquisition matter in which a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued on 13-8-1995. 2. We have gone through the record with the assistance of learned counsel for both the parties. 3. The…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492