| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 1688 2013 SLD 1688 2013 PLD 195 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Constitution Petitions Nos.23 and 11, Criminal OriginalPetitions Nos.23, 24 and 27, H.R.C. No. 14427-P, C.M.As.Nos. 1575, 1611, 1792, 197-K and 231-K and CriminalMiscellaneous Application No.587 of 2012..........
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J., JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA AND KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN, JJ
Constitution Petitions Nos.23 and 11, Criminal OriginalPetitions Nos.23, 24 and 27, H.R.C. No. 14427-P, C.M.As.Nos. 1575, 1611, 1792, 197-K and 231-K and CriminalMiscellaneous Application No.587 of 2012..........
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J., JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA AND KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN, JJ
Syed MAHMOOD AKHTAR NAQVI and others
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)----Ss. 4, 5, 9 & 10---Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 9, 14, 18 & 184(3)---Constitutional petition under Art. 184(3) of the Constitution seeking elaboration of constitutional and legal safeguards relating to the working of civil servants---Maintainability---Matter of tenure, appointment, posting, transfer and promotion of civil servants could not be dealt with in an arbitrary manner; it could only be sustained when it was in accordance with the law---Decision which deviated from the accepted or rule-based norm without proper justification, could be tested on the touchstone of a manifest public interest---Fundamental rights of civil servants, inter alia, under Arts.9, 14 & 18 of the Constitution were aspects arising in the present constitutional petition---Constitutional petition was maintainable. Tariq Aziz-ud-Din's case 2010 SCMR 1301; Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani v. Assistant Registrar PLD 2012 SC 466 and Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi v. Federation of Pakistan, Constitution Petition No.5 of 2012 ref. (b) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)--- ----S.16---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 5 & 184(3)---Civil servant, duties of---Non-subservience to political executive and impartiality---Scope---Although civil servants did have a duty to follow the policy guidelines and directions of the political executive yet, because of Art.5 of the Constitution, their foremost duty was "obedience to the Constitution and the law", not unthinking obedience to all directives (right or wrong) issued from the political executive---Civil servants were public servants and were, therefore, meant to take decisions only in accordance with law in the public interest---Civil servants in their capacity as advisors in decision making or as administrators and enforcers of law, were not subservient to the political executive---Civil servants were under an obligation to remain compliant with the Constitution and law, hence they were not obliged to be servile or unthinkingly submissive to the political executive---Civil servants to give advice in the best public interest and were to…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492