| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 170 2014 SLD 170 2014 PLC 464 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 1972 of 2012, decided on 6th September, 2012.
ALI BAQAR NAJAFI, J
Malik Muhammad Kabir for Petitioner. Khursheed Ahmad Satti, A.A.G. for
Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 1972 of 2012, decided on 6th September, 2012.
ALI BAQAR NAJAFI, J
Malik Muhammad Kabir for Petitioner. Khursheed Ahmad Satti, A.A.G. for
Respondents.
SAJID AZIZ
VS
SECRETARY SCHOOLS and others
Law:
Section:
Punjab Civil Servants Recruitment (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 1976--- ----R. 3(v)---Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), S.23---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.179 & 199---Constitutional petition---Recruitment with an age limit---Relaxation of upper age limit for government employee---Scope---Recruitment of School Educators with age limit of 20 to 35 years---Application of candidate (petitioner), who was a government employee, was rejected as he was over age---Contentions of candidate were that he had been in Government service for 15 years and 5 months and as per R.3(v) of Punjab Civil Servants Recruitment (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 1976 such time period had to be excluded for the purposes of considering his application and upper age limit for the post in question had to be relaxed in his case---Contentions on behalf of Provincial Government were that recruitment process was initiated on the basis of a recruitment policy, wherein no provision for relaxation of upper age limit for government servants was provided; that candidate had not challenged the said policy, therefore, he was not entitled to any relief, and that s of High Court relied upon by the candidate were pending adjudication in the Supreme Court---Validity---Right of government servant under R.3(v) of Punjab Civil Servants Recruitment (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 1976 was always available to him and he could press the same into service for further employment on contract or permanent posts---Law and rules framed under Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 had a higher value than policy letters---Judgments of High Court relied upon by the candidate were impugned before the Supreme Court but they were not suspended and in the event of a final verdict of the Supreme Court the entire law would have to be changed without any reservation as contemplated under Art.179 of the Constitution---Constitutional petition was allowed and concerned authority was directed to entertain the application of the candidate without raising objection as to upper age limit as he was fully entitled to the benefit of R.3(v) of Punjab Civil Servants Recruitment (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit)…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492