Case Details

Citation(s)
2014 SLG 646 2014 SLD 646 2014 MLD 1487
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 6700 of 1995, C.Ms. Nos. 2669 of 2006 and 3968 to 3971 of 2013, decided on 18-12-2013. Dates of hearing: 3, 9, 10, 17 and 18-12-2013.
AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, JUSTICE
Muhammad Umar Riaz for Petitioner. Muhammad Shafique for BOR. S.M. Naseem for
Respondent No.6. Imran Muhammad Sarwar for
Respondent No.8.

MST. SUGHRAN BIBI THROUGH L.RS. AND OTHERS

VS

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, FAISALABAD AND OTHERS

Law:

Section:

Pakistan Administration of Evacuee Property Rules, 1950--- ----R. 12---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Laches, principle of---Applicability---Sanction of mutation of sale on the basis of order of Custodian of Evacuee Property---Limitation---Scope---Requirements for granting relief in the constitutional petition was that the orders annexed with the said petition be presumed as correct and validly issued by the competent forum---Evidence was required for deciding title of petitioners with regard to property in question which could not be done in constitutional jurisdiction as complicated questions of facts were involved---Neither the original nor copy of alleged sale deed was on record---Respondents had purchased suit property in the auction proceedings conducted by the Banking Court and after purchase a sale certificate had been issued and mutation had been sanctioned in their favour---Application for confirmation of transaction was to be made within 60 days to the Custodian of Evacuee Property---Petitioners filed application before the Deputy Custodian for confirmation of transaction long after the alleged accrual of cause of action---Custodian was bound to issue notice to the Rehabilitation Authorities of the area and affected persons but no such notice had been issued---Property in question had been exchanged with the other land---Respondents had denied from any record and issuance of any certified copy from the office of Custodian---Petitioners could not be permitted to prove such record by adducing witness as well as other evidence---Local commission could not be appointed for confirmation of possession of petitioners---Applications moved by the petitioners before the Deputy Custodian for declaring the suit property as non-evacuee or muslim property were in contradiction with the endorsement of his order---Order passed by the Custodian could not be termed as an order in the eye of law---Complete and full-fledged trial was required for resolving dispute between the parties which practice could not be adopted in constitutional jurisdiction---Constitutional petition had been filed after about 38 years…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492