| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 2727 2014 SLD 2727 2014 PCRLJ 1727 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. 544 of 2010, decided on 19th November, 2012. DATE of hearing: 14th November, 2012
AFTAB AHMED GORAR, J
Ghulam Rasool Mangi for Appellant. Shabbir Ahmed Kambar for
Respondents Nos.2 to 5. Abdul Rahman Kolachi for the State
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. 544 of 2010, decided on 19th November, 2012. DATE of hearing: 14th November, 2012
AFTAB AHMED GORAR, J
Ghulam Rasool Mangi for Appellant. Shabbir Ahmed Kambar for
Respondents Nos.2 to 5. Abdul Rahman Kolachi for the State
MIR MUHAMMAD
VS
The STATE and 4 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)------Ss. 302, 147, 148, 149 & 114---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417(2-A)---Qatl-e-amd, rioting, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly, abettor present when offence committed---Appeal against acquittal---Appreciation of evidence---Contradictions in medical and ocular evidence and in evidence of investigation officer and prosecution witness---Delay in sending blood-stained earth and clothes of deceased to Chemical Examiner---Effect---Accused persons allegedly went to the house of complainant party while armed, whereafter co-accused directly fired at the deceased and killed him---Trial Court acquitted accused persons---Validity---Contradictions existed in ocular testimony of witnesses regarding passage of time between receiving injuries and death of deceased---Although at the time of incident distance between accused persons and complainant party was only a few feet but despite such fact not a single scratch was received by anyone except the deceased---According to the evidence of investigation officer blood-stained earth and clothes were sent to Chemical Examiner after a delay of about five months, which could be fatal to the prosecution case---Investigation officer also stated in his evidence that he did not recover any empty pallets from the place of incident---One of the prosecution witnesses stated in his cross-examination that his statement was recorded by the police at an Otaq, whereas investigation officer stated in his cross-examination that prosecution witnesses were produced by the complainant at the police station---Trial Court was right in acquitting the accused persons in circumstances---Appeal against acquittal of accused persons was dismissed. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 147, 148, 149 & 114---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417(2-A)---Qatl-e-amd, rioting, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly, abettor present when offence committed---Appeal against acquittal---Appreciation of evidence---Direct unanimous evidence of all prosecution witnesses---Medical evidence corroborating evidence of witnesses---Effect---Accused and co-accused persons allegedly…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492