| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 194 2014 SLD 194 2014 PLC 607 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. D-1087 of 2011, decided on 2nd October, 2013.
FAISAL ARAB AND SALAHUDDIN PANHWAR, JJ
Moiz Ahmed for Petitioner. Khalid Javed for
Respondent No. 1.
Constitutional Petition No. D-1087 of 2011, decided on 2nd October, 2013.
FAISAL ARAB AND SALAHUDDIN PANHWAR, JJ
Moiz Ahmed for Petitioner. Khalid Javed for
Respondent No. 1.
MAZHAR MUHAMMAD
VS
N.E.D. UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY through Vice Chancellor and another
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Civil service---Appointment---Selection---Standard/criteria---Domain of employer---Scope---Petitioner applied for the post of Manager (Sports) in the University---Scrutiny committee of the University after short listing, called the candidates for interview---Petitioner due to lack of experience was neither short-listed nor called for interview---University after completing all the formalities, appointed a suitable candidate against the post in question---Contention of the petitioner was that he had all the requisite qualifications, as described in the advertisement and the appointee had lacked required experience, therefore process of recruitment and appointment was illegal---Validity---Petitioner had failed to point out any material to show that respondent appointee had no requisite experience at the time of appointment---Employer had prerogative to set standard for selection and made selection from those selected persons who had qualification for appointment---Person though had qualification could not say that he should be selected for appointment in place of particular person---Constitutional petition was dismissed. 2005 SCMR 126; 2012 PLC 1340; 2004 YLR 1969 and PLD 2010 SC 679 ref. ORDER N.E.D. University of Engineering and Technology invited applications for various posts including the post of Manager (Sports), which is a BS-18 post. The petitioner, respondent No.2 and others applied for the post of Manager (Sports). The Scrutiny Committee formed by the University short listed four candidates, who were to be interviewed. The petitioner was placed at Sr.No.6, therefore, he was not called for interview. After interviewing the four short listed candidates, respondent No.2 was selected for the appointment. The petitioner having come to know that others have also been called for interview sought clarification from the Authority which was responded by stating that the only short listed candidates have been called for interview. The petitioner complained to the concerned Authority of the University as well as the Chancellor. Thereafter in 2007 the petitioner filed a complaint before the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492