| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 2278 2014 SLD 2278 2014 PCRLJ 1803 2015 PLJ 67 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 3079 of 2014, decided on 22nd May, 2014
SIKANDAR ZULQARNAIN SALEEM AND MUHAMMAD QASIM KHAN, JJ
Malik Ali Muhammad Dhol and Khalid Abdullah Khan Chingwani for Petitioner. Qazi Sadar-ud-Din for
Respondents Nos.3 to 5. Muhammad Ali Shahab, Deputy Prosecutor-General for the State
Writ Petition No. 3079 of 2014, decided on 22nd May, 2014
SIKANDAR ZULQARNAIN SALEEM AND MUHAMMAD QASIM KHAN, JJ
Malik Ali Muhammad Dhol and Khalid Abdullah Khan Chingwani for Petitioner. Qazi Sadar-ud-Din for
Respondents Nos.3 to 5. Muhammad Ali Shahab, Deputy Prosecutor-General for the State
GHULAM FARID
VS
The STATE and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)------S. 540---Summoning a person as witness---Object and scope---Court, jurisdiction of---Provision of S.540, Cr.P.C. is divided into two parts first is discretionary in nature, whereas the second is mandatory--- Solitary purpose of judicial proceedings in criminal cases is to find out truth and to arrive at a correct calculation and to see that no innocent person is punished---If it appears essential to Court that evidence is necessary for just decision of case, Trial Court is vested with jurisdiction to re-examine any witness and the only requirement is that his/her examination should be essential for the just decision of the case. (b) Judicial proceedings--- ----Object---Purpose of entire judicial proceedings is to find out truth and to arrive at correct decision. (c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Art. 3---Competency of witness---Child witness---Principle---Child of tender age, by reason of his/her youth, is not absolutely disqualified as a witness---No precise age prescribed which determines the question of competency of a person to give evidence---In case of child witness it is immaterial whether he/she can understand and answer in rational manner questions put to him/her---No general rule of universal application can be laid down that in no case evidence of child witness be believed---Each case depends upon its particular facts and circumstances. (d) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302 & 324---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S.7---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 200 & 540---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Re-summoning of witness---During trial of private complaint on the allegations of Qatl-e-amd, attempt to Qatl-e-amd and terrorism, injured eyewitness of 10-11 years of age was given up by complainant on the plea of her being minor---Subsequently complainant filed application for re-summoning of injured girl as witness but Trial Court dismissed that application---Validity---Court had inherent powers to ensure that justice was done---In cases when court smelt foul play, it was not only justified but duty bound, in the interest of justice, to ascertain…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492