Case Details

Citation(s)
2012 SLG 2547 2012 SLD 2547 2012 YLR 2288
Balochistan High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 2011, decided on 28th June, 2012. DATE of hearing: 11th June, 2012
MRS. SYEDA TAHIRA SAFDAR AND ABDUL QADIR MENGAL, MENGAL, JJ
Muhammad Qahir Shah for Appellant. Abdul Sattar Durrani Addl. P.G. for the State

ABDUL MALIK

VS

THE STATE

Law:

Section:

(a) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)--- ----S. 9(c)---Possession of narcotics---Appreciation of evidence---Allegation against the accused (appellant) was that he was searched at a Levies check post and 13 packets of charas (narcotic), weighing 13 kilograms, were found hidden in the secret cavities of his vehicle---Trial Court convicted the accused under section 9(c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997---Contentions of the accused were that it could not safely be said that 100 grams sent for analysis were secured from each slab of narcotic; that samples were sent for analysis after a delay of two and a half months; that the allegedly recovered narcotic was not weighed on the spot; that the recovery memos were not prepared on the site, and that the accused had purchased a ticket to travel in the apprehended vehicle, which belonged to a company-Validity-Accused had failed to produce any ticket or person of the alleged company which owned the vehicle---Prosecution had established the fact. that the accused was driving the vehicle alone, which fact was corroborated by the statement of the prosecution witnesses--Accused had failed to point out any ill-will or animosity towards him---All prosecution witnesses consistently stated that 13 packets, consisting of rods and slabs, were recovered from the possession of the accused and from each packet a total of 100 grams was collected for analysis---Samples were separated through memo in the presence of Levies officials, who handed it over to the Chemical Expert---Mere sending of samples for analysis with a delay was no basis to let the culprit go scot-free-Although preparation of recovery memos and other proceedings on the site excluded the possibility of false implication, but, in the present case, the incident took place at a far-flung check-post, in such circumstances, shifting of the vehicle along with the narcotic to a Levies station for preparation of memo did not five the impression that the accused had been implicated in a false, frivolous case, particularly when the possession of narcotic and seizure of the vehicle had been established by the prosecution---Appeal was dismissed and of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492