| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2012 SLG 2569 2012 SLD 2569 2012 YLR 2387 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6586/B of 2012, decided on 11th June, 2012
SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD AND SHAHID HAMEED DAR, JJ
Waseem Ahmad Butt for Petitioner. Hamayun Aslam, Deputy Prosecutor General Punjab for the State with Jehanzaib, ASP, Muhammad Arshad, S.-I. and Ghulam Mustafa, S.-I. for
Respondents
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6586/B of 2012, decided on 11th June, 2012
SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD AND SHAHID HAMEED DAR, JJ
Waseem Ahmad Butt for Petitioner. Hamayun Aslam, Deputy Prosecutor General Punjab for the State with Jehanzaib, ASP, Muhammad Arshad, S.-I. and Ghulam Mustafa, S.-I. for
Respondents
ABDUL QUDOOS
VS
THE STATE and another
Law:
Section:
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497(2)---Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Ss.9(c) & 15---Possession of narcotics, aiding, abetment or association in narcotic offences---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry--Police had apprehended the co-accused from whom 27 kilograms of narcotic was found and he disclosed that he was being patronized by the accused (police-constable), who had with him an amount of Rs.450, 000---Accused was subsequently arrested by the police and the said amount was allegedly recovered from him---Contentions of the accused were that he had been- involved in the case under a conspiracy by the inimical Investigating Officer so as to ruin his career, and that the Investigating Officer had failed to collect any incriminating evidence against him---Validity---Although F.I.R. revealed that Rs, 450,000 had been recovered from the accused but it did not disclose as to what this recovery was meant for---Co-accused had not alleged that he had paid the said amount to the accused for purchasing narcotics from him---Although such a heavy amount in the pocket of a police-constable raised eyebrows but without any auxiliary linking evidence, the accused could not be deemed to be a sponsor or patron of the co-accused---No incriminating evidence existed against the accused except for the ambiguous confessional statement of the co-accused--Investigation officer had conducted the investigation inefficiently and in-completely---Case of the accused constituted need for further inquiry into his guilt as envisaged by S. 497(2), Cr. P. C---Bail application was allowed and he was admitted to bail. ORDER The petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.1781, dated 18-11-2011, under section 9(c)/15 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, registered at Police Station Factory Area, Lahore. 2. Precisely, the prosecution case as narrated by Ghulam Mustafa, SI is that he while heading a contingent of police, conducted a raid, on a spy information, and apprehended accused Muhammad Ashraf, who had a plastic bag, hung against the seat of his motorcycle, which contained 45 packets filled with contraband charas; on weighing, it turned…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492