| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2014 SLG 325 2014 SLD 325 2014 PLC 1262 |
Islamabad High Court
Writ Petition No. 264 of 2011, heard on 9th February, 2012. Date of hearing: 9th February, 2012.
MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN KASI, J
Abdul Rehman Siddiqui for Petitioner. Qazi Rafi-ud-Din Babar, D.A.G. for
Respondent No. 1. Rehan Seerat for
Respondent No. 2.
Writ Petition No. 264 of 2011, heard on 9th February, 2012. Date of hearing: 9th February, 2012.
MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN KASI, J
Abdul Rehman Siddiqui for Petitioner. Qazi Rafi-ud-Din Babar, D.A.G. for
Respondent No. 1. Rehan Seerat for
Respondent No. 2.
ADNAN KHAN
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Information and Broadcasting and another
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199 ---Constitutional petition---Civil service---Advertised post---Prescribed criteria for candidates---Written test and interview---Entitlement to appear in interview---Minimum marks of 50% required for entitlement to appear in interview---Petitioner-candidate admitted that he was granted only 34% marks in the written test, which was less than the minimum marks required---Petitioner could not qualify in the written exam, therefore he was not entitled to appear in the interview---Constitution petition was dismissed accordingly. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN KASI, J.--- Petitioner has prayed for direction against the respondents for declaring him entitled for appointment as Assistant General Manager (Tech), PS-7 equal to BPS-17 with PEMRA with effect from the date when the others were appointed. 2. The petitioner claims his entitlement for the appointment on the basis of qualifying the written test conducted by the respondents. It is submitted that an identical matter has been remanded by the Hon'ble apex Court, pending before Hon'ble Chief Justice of this court and the present petition be heard along with the same petition. 3. The respondents contested the petition and repudiated the claim of the petitioner by stating that he could not clear the written test, because he obtained only 34 out of 100 marks, while the passing criteria is 50/100. It is submitted that there is no violation of law and fundamental right and, therefore, no order under Article 199 can be passed. The respondents have also filed…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492