| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 1822 2013 SLD 1822 2013 PLC 377 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.1041 of 2011, decision dated: 21st June, 2012
NASIR-UL-MULK, ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA AND SARMAD, JALAL OSMANY, JJ
Sardar Tariq Anees, Advocate Supreme Court. Sh. M. Suleman, Advocate Supreme Court No. 1.
Civil Petition No.1041 of 2011, decision dated: 21st June, 2012
NASIR-UL-MULK, ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA AND SARMAD, JALAL OSMANY, JJ
Sardar Tariq Anees, Advocate Supreme Court. Sh. M. Suleman, Advocate Supreme Court No. 1.
TEHSIL MUNICIPAL OFFICER, TMA KAHUTA and another
VS
GUL FRAZ KHAN
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 185(3)---Work charge (contractual) employment---Employee working on work charge basis claiming to be a regular employee---Employment on work charge (contractual) basis, irrespective of its period of length, not to accord employee status of regular employee---Respondent was initially employed by Health Department as chowkidar (watchman) on a work charge basis but after devolution of said Department all its assets, liabilities and offices were succeeded to the Municipal Administration (petitioner)---Services of respondent were transferred to the Municipal Administration, which paid him regular salary---High Court declared respondent to be a regular employee of the Municipal Administration (petitioner) on grounds of his continuous service for 13 years, since the Municipal Administration failed to show that his employment was contractual---Validity---Record showed that respondent was employed by the Health Department on a work charge basis initially for three months and his employment was extended at regular intervals for three months at a time---Documents placed on record by respondent clearly indicated that his employment with Municipal Administration was also on work charge basis and he was paid for the work he performed---Respondent's employment whether with the Health Department or with the Municipal Administration remained on work charge basis and he was never appointed as a regular employee and his employment on work charge basis, whatever its period of length, would not accord him status of regular employee---High Court had erred in holding the respondent a regular employee simply on account of failure of Municipal Administration to show that his appointment was on a work charge or contractual basis---Respondent had to substantiate his claim for regular appointment and same could not be deemed to have been established on failure of the Municipal Administration to prove the contrary---Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and allowed, impugned s were set aside and respondent was held not to be a regular employee of the Municipal Administration. JUDGMENT NASIR-UL-MULK, J.---Tehsil Municipal Officer, Tehsil…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492