Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 787 2011 SLD 787 2011 CLC 1610
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.6720 of 2009, decision dated: 31st May, 2011
SYED KAZIM RAZA SHAMSI, J

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD IRFAN

VS

TARIQ MEHMOOD and others

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 12(2)

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 12(2)

Law: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)

Section: 13

West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)-------S. 13---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.12(2)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Void order---Fraud and misrepresentation---Judgment, setting aside of---Petitioner claimed to be owner in possession of property in question and sought setting aside of eviction order alleging that it was a result of fraud and misrepresentation---Rent Controller dismissed the application under S.12(2), C.P.C. filed by the petitioner on the ground that provisions of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, were not applicable to proceedings before Rent Controller---Order passed by Rent Controller was maintained by Lower Appellate Court---Validity---Proceedings taken by Rent Controller, after recording statement of attorney of petitioner, became without lawful authority as the attorney had performed an act for which he was never authorized, thus order of ejectment was procured by practising fraud upon the Court---Though Civil Procedure Code, 1908, was not applicable to rent proceedings but fact remained that Rent Controller should follow equitable principles contained in Civil Procedure Code, 1908, for the reason that no wrong could be left un­remedied---Every court or tribunal had inherent jurisdiction to rescind or recall a void order passed by itself---Order of eviction passed against petitioner was a void order as the same was procured fraudulently and by making misrepresentation---Every court or tribunal had the power to even suo motu recall or review an order obtained from the Court by fraud on general principle that fraud vitiated the most solemn proceedings and no party should be allowed to take advantage of his own fraud---High Court declared the order passed by both the Courts below as ineffective and void and the same was set aside---High Court directed Rent Controller to follow the rule laid down by superior courts and to proceed in accordance with law---Petition was allowed accordingly. PLD 1991 SC 997 fol. Ahmad Shahzad Farooq Rana for Petitioner. Mian Muhammad Nawaz for Respondents. ORDER SYED KAZIM RAZA SHAMSI, J.--- This constitutional petition is directed against the order-dated…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492