| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 2171 2013 SLD 2171 2013 YLR 311 |
Islamabad High Court
Writ Petitions Nos. 2044, 1141 of 2011 and 2051 to 2058 of 2009, decided on 30th May, 2012. DATE of hearing: 27th April, 2012
SHAUKAT AZIZ SIDDIQUI, J
Malik Muhammad Nawaz, Sh. M. Khizar-ur-Rashid and Syed Asghar Hussain Sabzwari for Petitioner. Atta Ullah Hakeem Kundi for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Shahina Akbar for
Respondent No. 3
Writ Petitions Nos. 2044, 1141 of 2011 and 2051 to 2058 of 2009, decided on 30th May, 2012. DATE of hearing: 27th April, 2012
SHAUKAT AZIZ SIDDIQUI, J
Malik Muhammad Nawaz, Sh. M. Khizar-ur-Rashid and Syed Asghar Hussain Sabzwari for Petitioner. Atta Ullah Hakeem Kundi for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Shahina Akbar for
Respondent No. 3
Mir LAEEQUE SHAH and others
VS
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 25 & 199---Constitutional Petition--- Development Authority---Allotment of plots to employees on deputation---Cut-off date for allotment of plots to employees---Petitioners served on deputation in the Development Authority and contended that they had been denied the right of allotment of plots; that other similarly placed persons had been extended such benefit/right that the cut-off-date, whereby only those deputation employees were entitled to allotment who were serving Development Authority as of that date was illegal---Validity---Petitioners served at the Development Authority much prior to the cut-off date for allotment of plots---Benefit of allotment of plots could not be extended invariably to all employees, whether regular or on deputation, unless they fulfilled the prescribed criteria---Contentions of the petitioners, if accepted, would mean that all employees on deputation who served at the Development Authority in different cadres during past decades would become entitled to allotment of plots---By providing a cut-off date, in fact, anomaly of a situation had been avoided, which was based on reasonableness and a standard of rationale---Petitioners could not pray for equal treatment when it was their case that they had left the Development Authority much prior to the cut-off date---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Writ Petition No.760 of 2000; Writ Petition Nos. 299, 498 of 1998; Writ Petition Nos. 3041, 3579 of 2001, 588, 589, 1071 of 2002 and 790 of 2003 and CPLA Nos. 741, 742, 743 and 744 of 2003 rel. JUDGMENT SHAUKAT AZIZ SIDDIQUI, J.---Through this single judgment following Writ Petitions are being disposed of, together, as common question of law and facts are involved in all the petitions:-- (i) Writ Petition No.2044 of 2011, titled Mir Laeeque Shah v. CDA and others (ii) Writ Petition No.1141 of 2011, titled Muhammad Jalal Sikandar Sultan v. CDA and others (iii) Writ Petition No.2051 of 2009, titled Imtiaz Ahmad Vohra v. CDA, (iv) Writ Petition No.2052 of 2009, titled Ghulam Dastgir v. CDA, (v) Writ Petition No.2053 of 2009, titled Ch. Muhammad Ali v. CDA, (vi) Writ Petition…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492